IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] WGLC on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Thu, 03 May 2018 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0682127241 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 18:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H98AsuCDjfXT for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 18:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89243127286 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2018 18:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Wed, 2 May 2018 18:09:22 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Wed, 2 May 2018 18:09:22 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
CC: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Doh] WGLC on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https
Thread-Index: AQHT4ntfU0d5oFjoxkmwtaX8yfa5wg==
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 01:09:22 +0000
Message-ID: <9972068C-8CD1-4389-B3E1-0B2DA2417DAD@icann.org>
References: <CAHbrMsAqFfPc00KBjgyk-vW28QMNYndChB-FTSeU9NXfGPMZ-w@mail.gmail.com> <A28564C5-8675-4C64-8C6A-6C66762F49DE@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <A28564C5-8675-4C64-8C6A-6C66762F49DE@sinodun.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_64CF98AD-0B08-4854-ABA4-7AC0DEB33275"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/bzN_r17SXpr824mucYp2d6YkBZk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] WGLC on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 01:09:28 -0000

On May 2, 2018, at 6:23 AM, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:
> 
> One other last nit/question on this. The WG charts states:
> 
> “The primary focus of this working group is to develop a mechanism that
> provides confidentiality and connectivity between DNS clients (e.g., operating
> system stub resolvers) and recursive resolvers.”
> 
> But the definitions in the Terminology are simply ‘DNS API client' and ‘DNS API server’. Much of the discussion of caching and DNSSEC is specific to stup-resolver interactions so I think this needs to be addressed.
> 
> I suggest stating the scope clearly in the draft e.g.:
> 
> "This document focuses on communication between DNS clients (e.g., operating
> system stub resolvers) and recursive resolvers, as per
>  the charter of the DOH Working Group at the time of writing.”

Good catch, yes.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email