IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7DC127444 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 05:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ucOM-2EegNtr for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 05:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (www.ducksong.com [192.155.95.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178EB12741D for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 05:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-f171.google.com (mail-ot0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A1953A03B for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-f171.google.com with SMTP id v64-v6so23145153otb.13 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 05:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAaRbdGPWz6Avh33aUL4WtzeHXFwaFC/czmddaRRmHuXCfbVtjx jboeDALBheA/kBQP0jkQvithOieKqsO2IaZqOlY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48+n/kZ1rFsROPomSQmtjq8EEA9mU2fvvFCEsFpbojqDQ8BYy2PxeympYrfLTsvJx0atgUh1v7+jFm9xF0QUOM=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:55bb:: with SMTP id m56-v6mr10087448oth.110.1522846199108; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 05:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.70.23 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 05:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <39301825-be3c-5888-ce99-45caf5ab0857@o2.pl>
References: <39301825-be3c-5888-ce99-45caf5ab0857@o2.pl>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:49:58 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpzUk1NVjGGct-9CJ9JdnQcgrJOm1Hfput_ob-HvSZ4VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpzUk1NVjGGct-9CJ9JdnQcgrJOm1Hfput_ob-HvSZ4VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bedb3f056905423f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/cdX2tLjtD1dxuRWjX6-33sMp5mA>
Subject: Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:50:02 -0000

neither https not uris are limited to any particular port. I don't see a
problem here..

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl> wrote:

> Hello,
> I think that it may be beneficial to specify that a DOH server MAY work on
> a
> port other than 443 and that the DOH client MUST support accessing DOH
> servers
> on ports other than 443.
>
> I have been thinking about the possibility of adding support for DOH to a
> home
> router. In the future, someone may modify dnsmasq so that it would act as
> a DOH
> server - dnsmasq could then run on this router and provide DOH services.
> The port 443 would be already used by the router's management interface
> which
> would probably run as a separate process on this router (as it would be an
> entirely different codebase). So dnsmasq would have to provide DOH
> services on
> another port.
>
> Greetings,
> Mateusz Jończyk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email