Re: [Doh] [Ext] Associating a DoH server with a resolver

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 24 October 2018 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091B0130DF3 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 04:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nIOy0MUisWVd for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 04:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB76130DF5 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 04:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:54242) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gFHH2-000BJv-1y (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:24:37 +0100
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:24:28 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <67726F45-C947-48ED-B6ED-ABE2BD547AB1@icann.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810241222310.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <02C39DFD-9550-447D-B00E-702B441A88BE@icann.org> <CABkgnnV2YMtcdOyMfE2NMH4L1ZbK4dcp1KQt3FttCfz-nfQd6A@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVnyCg==75P2A_kLgtTGq2Wwdkw-930o1YEMT53PhpqCA@mail.gmail.com> <67726F45-C947-48ED-B6ED-ABE2BD547AB1@icann.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/dKbpFtqgUjd86Hv7UVUWtpjRKdo>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Associating a DoH server with a resolver
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:24:45 -0000

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 6:10 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oh, I forgot.  IP-based certificates complicate things considerably,
> > and will make this impossible to deploy in many cases (think of the
> > many resolvers with 1918 addresses, for example).
>
> They don't make it "impossible" by a long shot. Plenty of resolvers,
> even corporate resolvers, have public addresses.

Both of our CAs will not give us iPAddress certificates.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: West 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 until later. Rough or very
rough. Occasional rain. Good occasionally poor.