[Doh] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-doh-00-10: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 26 September 2017 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietf.org
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0281321DC; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: doh-chairs@ietf.org, doh@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.62.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150640675354.13837.4615669192086496516.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:19:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/dctoEcJ4SpKZ_wb0NX_FrTXlj0I>
Subject: [Doh] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-doh-00-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 06:19:13 -0000

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-doh-00-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


(I would be a Yes, but I don't want to be the first one)

Thanks to everyone for the spirited review to date. I think the changes are
headed the right direction. I trust that will continue.

I have one nit. In this text,

"The specification of how to discover DOH servers via mechanisms currently used
to discover other DNS servers (e.g., DHCP and Router Advertisements) may be
considered by the working group if the chairs determine that a sufficiently
large mass of working group participants exist who are willing to edit and
comment on documents regarding such mechanisms."

is "large" the best word to describe what you're expecting the chairs to be