Re: [Doh] [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 12 March 2019 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6661277E7; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-JYVxva92TZ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EC05130E8C; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 036C4280285; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:49:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id EE9B2280522; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:49:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6559280285; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:49:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CA8663E720; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:49:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D29D440235; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:49:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:49:13 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, doh@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, "Ackermann, Michael" <mackermann@bcbsm.com>, nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>, dns-privacy@ietf.org, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190312154913.4ch2bn6jyu53tfhl@nic.fr>
References: <1700920918.12557.1552229700654@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <7667c4d7-2e78-0a27-84af-cf1c00fd4897@cs.tcd.ie> <1991054337.12802.1552259263075@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <eea64b30-aad0-a030-5360-1b1484f1d0e3@huitema.net> <CAPsNn2WhjHSEHJUEL8GB6X0d24fkajgPnY4YgkOQbXjyxb5q8Q@mail.gmail.com> <e62efaf3-4a35-4a52-5ed4-dee2e7fafe72@huitema.net> <69f989ba-0939-b917-b586-9e3af3fb8b74@redbarn.org> <092c081b-50b2-0c37-7a06-a3bd16c9ccdb@huitema.net> <3e91ec1f-f2d5-a3f1-a40c-5039d24f49b9@redbarn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3e91ec1f-f2d5-a3f1-a40c-5039d24f49b9@redbarn.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.3.12.153916
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/g1A_qv0TG_E1yXzup5uxB1b_zHY>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:49:17 -0000

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:17:43PM -0700,
 Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote 
 a message of 36 lines which said:

> > You claim the right to impose your rules, because it is "your network".
> > Yet you have to define ownership.

> my network, my rules. your provider's network, their rules.

I clearly disagree. If the case of my home network (mine, my rules) is
clear, the case of a corporate network is less clear (an employee is
not a slave, and he/she has rights) and the case of a commercial
Internet access provider is clear in the other direction: a client is
not an employee, and is entitled to a free, open and neutral Internet
access.