Re: [Doh] On shutting down work on draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh

The chairs can either mark the old draft "Parked" Or "Dead" in the data
tracked and add a comment with a link to the current draft.

I actually did the Datatracker stuff to mark draft-sah-resolver-information
as
"Replaces".  draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh

hope that doesn't upset the authors.

Tim

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 5:38 PM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> wrote:
>
>> Paul Hoffman writes:
>> > Given that, I'd like the WG to drop consideration of
>> > draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh. I could do a final draft of
>> > draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh that is a tombstone so that
>> > people in the future know that we consciously killed it.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> It looks like this never got a response.  Personally (no hats) I'd
>> like that proposed final documenting of consciously dropping it.
>
>
>
> +1 (and sorry for not responding earlier).
>
> It seems much better to document that this was intentional and not that
> e.g people just got sidetracked, etc.
>
> W
>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Doh mailing list
>> Doh@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
> in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
> pants.
>    ---maf
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>