[Doh] meta qtypes

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Sun, 18 March 2018 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <miek@miek.nl>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A2312D80E for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 07:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=miek-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhHq6VhpxV2b for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 07:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9A012D7FC for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 07:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l9so1739686wmh.2 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 07:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=miek-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=Xyny/fdOfRwOC0A8VlFgUZO+ozsn+Yllg8W39Oj54w0=; b=SH1XVGWXnmDFi4NoaVJqDfg5Lt0pfvIRE8+l6nqD5puZgWH7KlKBPYS9gNBFUO1K// +4pMVh4YsEEXydknugvWf1frH3KIPQfK9ULIlvsf1z5Tpx4w5/FrFjs4Ag1DeB2M6eqd 4oTrjGAEl5BNLA4nR6cT3w5SwrcONpiFCxlK3AMVdSqojo91CFGEXQd778YTMm4lx4kU FF+83PfL9WdJBsSrVyyWSjO4eiBlAtg0AqVXARlWKR+y2VhcpC2TxdbkCTujGXvmKJG+ rAuD/QlorhgtUjQMGBI1WWf3iwK0WIHq6bFRat8KGhHFLAPCjSM3jG8xnTA2HqsSMCQC RCJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=Xyny/fdOfRwOC0A8VlFgUZO+ozsn+Yllg8W39Oj54w0=; b=Cnnsyo5x5PkriZItJVtudfYBSCLsRa2J/jT3oc+HhsiB2cMbBTrFCyc2qWDuqna2N+ 7ZzU8OUF9P9/wMltbe2kODBLr7t9H4421ZQcea6nkn7ysXGAILgrXAxowU2I13L5p56r oZ8+/17JfOCSp/8oYkPWn1pBxvvhZdiHSeCbXmIfRXL8nbJYB8Me1WdJXuhP6LwIg22o N5ne14IYUR4fqhlnjw9BOS9UwoDvlOF5KreAkZI517y5JeUWLKOc4N/u8onrHXg4fqYr 39DSJTndqYVlHM2/lRyDEkO8b0Do7ov7A9WiBg0wk79rjfOKdgT5yxbLd/4DVc7pt9Fy qGxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HxGx2FBmNOAIyJ24AWPlb4/XqVh0iYAE67+4UTk59FsOoD0E2t lZyoYBez8OZsP9dX/psnaoIZVcXjb/k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs/EBTJ3NYOuc+jVOPIL61jkT9v9cYUXViJ4XXPsg3dtzonT+OVDsYT/gcpn5cMCUzdiodLAw==
X-Received: by 10.28.159.68 with SMTP id i65mr6696956wme.27.1521383893496; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 07:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miek.nl ([2001:67c:1232:144:b320:5945:16d2:52c4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm12482878wrc.30.2018.03.18.07.38.12 for <doh@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 18 Mar 2018 07:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:38:11 +0000
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180318143811.bn5kwr7oqo2ux6qm@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/hfjwCnqIEbfySAJT05vM70EUFgQ>
Subject: [Doh] meta qtypes
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:38:17 -0000

Hi,

-03 has the following text in section 7.1.

   Other types of DNS data, such as
   zone transfers, may be larger and benefit more from revalidation.
   DNS API servers may wish to consider whether providing these
   validation enabling response headers is worthwhile.

this implies DoH servers need to support IXFR/AXFR (fine), but that replies to 
these may now be cached? I think this is new behavior from a DNS standpoint.

(Should the draft also mention dynamic updates, notify messages and other 
opcodes as being supported?)

/Miek

--
Miek Gieben