IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 16 January 2019 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02031311E9 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fw6dole7wWXr for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8051311E8 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:07 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:07 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
CC: "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Doh] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh
Thread-Index: AQHUretP0VTIQeZ7IkaYZj9E95gW+g==
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:32:06 +0000
Message-ID: <78C9AA8D-1599-46F1-91C7-356E58DD960A@icann.org>
References: <8999D6F3-600E-4F1A-903C-10F8CAA6E4F3@icann.org> <1547674141.291889.1636540384.54D5BB3E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1547674141.291889.1636540384.54D5BB3E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1FCD5282-8F7B-4323-9B25-B3C9D8DA8C0F"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/htig-zRcC8MrcLdnEC_VX7wbO6s>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:32:16 -0000

On Jan 16, 2019, at 1:29 PM, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019, at 11:25, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> People from a few browser vendors have expressed unofficial interest in 
>> implementing at least parts of it if it gets standardized, so it seems 
>> like a good idea to try to standardize it. There is still a reasonable 
>> amount of work to be done in the document itself, and it certainly needs 
>> input from both browser and DNS folks.
> 
> What happened to DRIU?  It seemed like there was an effort to work on the problem more generally.  

There was little interest in anything other than this part.

> But I see the DoT comment down-thread and wonder whether this is the right place for doing this sort of work.

DPRIVE is (sadly very slowly) working on draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op, where DoT discovery would fit just fine.

--Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email