Re: [Doh] New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 12 March 2019 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951A4130E77 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xT9VsmKgEwZf for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E079E130E46 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 1771C28033B; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:09:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (pa-th3.interco.nic.fr [192.134.4.74]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E3B28011C; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:09:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A001663E080; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:09:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF8B540235; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:09:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:09:15 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190312150915.slfq3bgxhuw2uv4t@nic.fr>
References: <EA2A119D-06CF-4B0B-8994-86A99CD8AC0B@cable.comcast.com> <20190309182857.GA29321@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <6ED365D5-8717-46A6-B75E-A628753C2979@fl1ger.de> <20190310073306.GA10396@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <5FE94C8C-158D-43AD-86B6-1949A8F740EC@fl1ger.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5FE94C8C-158D-43AD-86B6-1949A8F740EC@fl1ger.de>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/kkaIgJ-f-FILZ_-LVyfwPPYitss>
Subject: Re: [Doh] New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:09:21 -0000

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:47:03AM +0100,
 Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> wrote 
 a message of 48 lines which said:

> Most jurisdictions though have something from the old roman law “Ignorantia
> legis non excusat” meaning not knowning the law doesn’t protect you from
> punishment.

« Nul n'est censé ignorer la loi » in french.

In the cases I mentioned, the people know the law and never pretended
they were not aware of it. But there is a difference between the law,
which applies automatically to all residents, and the court decisions,
which apply only to the parties involved.

Also, in the case of the police blacklist, as I said, it is secret,
even if people want to enforce it, they cannot.

> Good, but even not for profit need money from someone and I doubt
> that we can supply DoH service for large portion of the Internet
> using non profit organisations.

But the goal is not to provide services to "a large portion". There is
no point in creating a "not-for-profit GAFA". Quite the contrary. What
I would like to see is a lot of small DoH resolvers, each with its own
group of users.

> You didn’t mention an alternative or do you really think a lot of
> different non profit organisations will provide resolving for the
> Internet?

Yes. Like they provide most of the interesting stuff on the
Internet.