Re: [Doh] Working Group Session Agenda @ Prague

"Martin Thomson" <> Wed, 13 March 2019 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4458130FF4 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=IBseuugC; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=MYfTcxoN
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YifDFzyGfclc for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437F513121C for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal []) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216D021C4F for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:02:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:02:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:subject :content-type; s=fm1; bh=/J93bTUEG42l6rtymMMSgXDeI5HcnWvNR5XF1Sg T/k0=; b=IBseuugCjlKAvcawtBb1kd1kKq+e8yYPLy3QQQIYYnKhaif4uhLrSzu +XZll59gEAzdDtLOQRxJgpDAfEgQQiBO9kd5C9WaA7vmjToc2srpmhbb9CIkHHb+ eEZHXG6TL+r73JgSW3l9xdp/5y5R0KxjMJ/HCh7BHim//GvZMP3hlgSQnHw/ntYA 7B4cWr8P/MOf8ifjwvhRrLaQ2dDiO+zyNwbCJGFHzBzloUcpZKS49kQLS5tevPQK 9O7JAl6v1oVRG0rCU4DiHuUWqPs+kK5hDM3ibkidGa8YOcO/k4xi5LhohIycv9hi vhSSB/n7abPZJxYZ91nI6sHxaHOQlwg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=/J93bTUEG42l6rtym MMSgXDeI5HcnWvNR5XF1SgT/k0=; b=MYfTcxoN3W6bh5CDo76htL+j1fGU4xRnX pbBQJzB+U9gSIyEhiaM4csX3iIwNwKg0TpzVFynnsEAax7077U8WRGDIv1awbLnh 7QTPSP+0ujg4veRGMgy1egNJb1IkP1SaSKdC+iqCLThXL0aydo9H/dPxPUaltV2L eEaxW05e77SnjQ95GRP7YuECgnZw+z0Uujzh+GCvyj6P0MrlMQB7XI56zomClA1X lBWto6ofBAuVpWgDDRkgQ7DS/XdQmTOY9ARkn2NHeS63a9r/uKpibzWpFu4KIv1T twsl1QXsX/0XyTmNxCdSn7GP7Kb7Z/r2NQEKGawPSseMYp8og7YbA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4n2JXBJ8AU8JFA4Wz1TNqigj_5r5GZXpdvdkrIc8h9LsfAfTQiGZ_A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrhedtgdduheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvthenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4n2JXBb11pYGyqvNxJh5LN3tL_e_Lar-4uoNnPr3E2ni3u0BcSIjhQ> <xmx:4n2JXEsLqx_LDiZjD8sjKUEwknGfTel2HQQZ3AO3WNycqPVjWprf2w> <xmx:4n2JXGs6HKpK-usZuJQ_ObfMkvAueZyzCUnwymsBpwFh99VlJ2g8TA> <xmx:432JXJgGOJKd837upQ1D7vfXvxt8P_5GbdRq6O06wVuDjPbdELVWcA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A55B17C1EB; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:02:10 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-925-g644bf8c-fmstable-20190228v5
X-Me-Personality: 92534000
Message-Id: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:02:10 -0400
From: "Martin Thomson" <>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Working Group Session Agenda @ Prague
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:02:15 -0000

Given the volume of discussion on-list about the latter two talks, and the absence of any significant time for open discussion, what do you expect us to gain from this session?  I fully support spending the bulk of the time here on resolver-associated, but I'm concerned that having the same presentation given twice in the balance of time.  It could be three if you wanted to use the last 10 minutes on draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients. 

Having a clear goal in mind might help this be a productive use of time; and - if I might suggest - a shorter period of presentation (maybe Jim can negotiate with his co-author) followed by a very narrowly scoped discussion would be useful.  There are lots of different concerns in these drafts, but maybe we can find one key point to concentrate on.  I don't see us being able to settle one, let alone two, but we might get further into a single topic. 

If I were to offer a suggestion for that topic, I'd want to talk a little about the indistinguishability characteristics of DoH as distinct from DoT.  And the operational consequences of the same.  That seems well within the remit of this group.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, at 02:17, Dave Lawrence wrote:
> * Note Well
> * draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh, Paul Hoffman, 30 minutes
> * draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues, Jason Livingood, 10
>   minutes
> * draft-reid-doh-operator, Jim Reid, 10 minutes
> * Open discussion
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list