Re: [Doh] [Ext] Associating a DoH server with a resolver

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 25 October 2018 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A381286E3 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 04:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lIfIbd0gOyh9 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 04:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D861286D9 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 04:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:38558) by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gFe2i-0004OH-cs (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:43:12 +0100
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:43:11 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <0603C647-35EB-44BB-A221-420DDE817ABA@rfc1035.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810251241570.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <02C39DFD-9550-447D-B00E-702B441A88BE@icann.org> <CABkgnnV2YMtcdOyMfE2NMH4L1ZbK4dcp1KQt3FttCfz-nfQd6A@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVnyCg==75P2A_kLgtTGq2Wwdkw-930o1YEMT53PhpqCA@mail.gmail.com> <67726F45-C947-48ED-B6ED-ABE2BD547AB1@icann.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810241222310.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <0603C647-35EB-44BB-A221-420DDE817ABA@rfc1035.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-851835995-1540467792=:24450"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/meBhgmUTNhyc0xc2Hld9Wnok4zY>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Associating a DoH server with a resolver
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:43:16 -0000

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2018, at 12:24, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> >
> > Both of our CAs will not give us iPAddress certificates.
>
> I’m fairly sure there’s an RIR based not a million miles away from
> Amsterdam who would be delighted to issue with certificates for your IP
> addresses.

I don't think RPKI will be much use for web PKI purposes :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
strengthen the democratic process and ensure that
there is a just and representative system of government