Re: [Doh] WGLC on draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https

Hi All, 

A small pull request after off-list comments by Willem Toorop on the wording for DNSSEC usage:
https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/176 <https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/176>

Sara. 

> On 4 May 2018, at 18:03, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All, 
> 
> The text in the latest GitHub version of the draft now uses phrases like "a client MUST specifically authorize DNS API servers”. 
> 
> I’m not clear if there is any difference between ‘authorizing’ a server and just using a server? If there is some subtlety here then I’d like to understand if but if not I created https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/174 <https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/174> to simplify the text and also put the discussion of selection of server in its own section. 
> 
> Sara. 
> 
>> On 30 Apr 2018, at 18:59, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com <mailto:sara@sinodun.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 4) Section 8: With regard to trusted/untrusted servers I would suggest at least a small restructure for clarity. At the moment the first discussion of the client trust model is in section 5.3 ‘Server Push’.
>> 
>> I would suggest adding a section before this (possibly after section 3) called something like ’Trust model for client queries’ with the following (combining text from section 5.3 and 8):
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh