Re: [Doh] [EXTERNAL] Re: New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BA9130E7C for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Vc99Cq4PulE for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com [96.114.158.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42963130E90 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190220p; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1552269681; x=2416183281; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=04NxZ+BwBjyaI/f9Qgcq0ywwRc19wp+kT++BDuPIT6I=; b=gJFG56wh5bi+DHptDfFnzd45MLMfAVR90VmBbOgGowfnUF3JJzcRNT/LZaTI4Lbm f8YS24RoThgItEHBoEMt+XUWBNraO24FNHe10tDLtR9aMXHDmV/QXsQVxtZgBswX dG/3nk8aL7tAJbaUZ3lemIxnTIUIkX1gJ1hoptH6byFluoXNkN268nyiQ/aMNhO1 +aCKYPzg+D/QSADbgNdojJDp1Q+3vG1WsmNb1Efnjyjm3SFdubODUbNTYonNK3Cc M09FhpRioi7jwk58iErB2y4DFJt/NDdlMgY2fVwtVfKpvr3v4Pavz2Hx/wPbI0nq h/1HXTO/y2Gecsf+SAcEq73ruQjZuLe6HjU39GunntQMS+BkqxIOcVc0Bzw5q7qa hTTDaIZmDnCShFUh57+95PJhTn9ft+6BjxCOahMYXGVkqRHddz/0bv0F9zNSVnbM ORvdmfv5HFW1PZxHryxt9CgB6OOzn1B5e4PDA9IUHxENGJzBnMrofO1Fepn7F1uc vE0lZPVf6Y6zsKhuGh7kZZDFYsc0q4+UNmmSBKCnm9CLNQQ8BlnoFOgv9X0EyRAz oP5bvRIPydwDFRa5vHsUH6nj/b3M73HkIk3qZJfQTTRn7JggtDF/3pFR1l/FxXg+ Un2XV08FZOdKuji7wqRGK2x6ctTK2ZRyVT0aKWuloZ4=;
X-AuditID: 60729ed4-2e5ff700000044dc-7a-5c85c171f069
Received: from COPDCEXC40.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout02.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id A8.7E.17628.171C58C5; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:01:21 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by COPDCEXC40.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:01:20 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:01:20 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
CC: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Doh] New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues
Thread-Index: AQHU1hbDDNj2GhBc2k6lTCYNWHxRBaYD846AgAA6YICAAI/zAIAA8pSA
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:01:20 +0000
Message-ID: <108AC104-CE43-4DD7-8C6C-383BBACDE038@cable.comcast.com>
References: <EA2A119D-06CF-4B0B-8994-86A99CD8AC0B@cable.comcast.com> <20190309182857.GA29321@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <6ED365D5-8717-46A6-B75E-A628753C2979@fl1ger.de> <20190310073306.GA10396@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190310073306.GA10396@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.16.1.190220
x-originating-ip: [68.87.29.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E0B1867E73AB0546B3864A267B8BB82B@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrMKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsm7hwdYYg4mHxCwmLHzJaPF841Y2 i2t3L7I5MHt8f72A2WPJkp9MHhP/bWAKYI5qYLQpyShKTSxxSU1LzStOteNSwAA2Salp+UWp rolFOZVBqTmpidiVgVSmpOZklqUW6WM1Rh+rOQldTBnNB34zFdxjr7jQuIyxgfEIexcjJ4eE gIlE36EpLF2MXBxCAruYJHZM/APltDBJ7F04B8o5zShx5OtXVpAWNgEzibsLrzCD2CIC7hJT f/SB2cwCkhKPjh8CGyssECHRfHwpVE2kxNX90xm7GDmAbDeJpvs5IGEWAVWJE3s+s4DYvAIu Eh/u/YPadR9o1/d/YL2cAnYSE7ZeAytiFBCT+H5qDRPELnGJW0/mM0G8ICCxZM95ZghbVOLl 439gd4oK6Ets6XvAAhGXk+jZ0Qp2A7OApsT6XfoQY6wkOicsZYOwFSWmdD9kh7hHUOLkzCdQ reISh4/sYJ3AKDkLyeZZCJNmIZk0C8mkWUgmLWBkXcXIZ2mmZ2hoomdoaqFnZGi0iRGclOZd 2cF4ebrHIUYBDkYlHt72Ha0xQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4760CCvGmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2KU 5mBREudV3wyUEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CyTJxcEo1MDLq/3Rye5NekyLfuWWW8Gaf3U5Mwsz7l/5l 8K/RtZIRCRYzNbra2fFl3ambiZeOvudhcrs4zVTB7sCSSxJs8t4KMV1lS4UvLtEPPu/XZ7wp MWStqVm1VPXmvbHSSutu5OcUTdHmznQTCupUkm+dyalvsyZt2o/bt0/L5PwqWbjJOtrcKa5A iaU4I9FQi7moOBEAUMp6KUYDAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/oEtkh0zCo_80dajckPOu3IXkcMI>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [EXTERNAL] Re: New: draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:01:34 -0000


On 3/10/19, 3:37 AM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
    > I think the only way to get lots of DoH providers is to help the
    > ISPs to do it as they are the natural decentralised player on the
    > internet.
    
    Clearly, we disagree here, but it seems more a political disagreement
    than a technical issue with the protocol of this WG.

[JL] Perhaps so. See Section 2 @ https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues-01#section-2. In any case, months ago I started to raise some of these (non-protocol but implementation) issues on the DoH WG list and it was suggested I document them and bring it back to the WG, which is what I have done.