Re: [Doh] Dedicated DoH port

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Fri, 12 April 2019 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD07A120641 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 04:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89_bKWnUx2uO for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 04:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (www.haxx.se [IPv6:2a00:1a28:1200:9::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0AFA120381 for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 04:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (mail [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id x3CB5agQ026919 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:05:36 +0200
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x3CB5Zun026915; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:05:36 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:05:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Petr_=A9pa=E8ek?= <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, doh@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <af89fa30-b9a3-f471-50fc-bab48fb9cc32@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904121303500.31156@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <d74add8f-8964-1c0f-cd2e-f10867390883@nic.cz> <87tvf48hyd.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <af89fa30-b9a3-f471-50fc-bab48fb9cc32@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1129329158-2055282175-1555067136=:31156"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/oNN6ycZ-k0C72JnJZCczClKGXIM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Dedicated DoH port
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:05:53 -0000

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Petr Špaček wrote:

> It utterly confuses me that this very WG on one hand invented DoH protocol 
> because DoT is not good enough, but then WG participants claims it should 
> not be enabled by default.

We're all individuals here. We have different opinions and views. You'll even 
find that some of us disagree!

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se