IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] panel discussion on DoH/DoC

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8B1124BF6 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:49:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T34vQ36Q_X5C for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0C31200D8 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x17GnB7d061634 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:49:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1549558154; bh=17W80pTVqgXu/bP90UyrV9ieK0vJqCCdlsdqzy5qCl4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FWXr6sIeUMFZYhrjoXOkEXiyf0a1m0stdVvCrQErco0e8jmproU85NPuGWMpyF7m4 lDlJQOVtPcpd6lBv0bMoqPgY+7ebaHmh7MIpNZ/fRpPCs1mgLZdvegfdMRgVT2OkhC eQaxoMHC9kyL39l0e9Nt3/Dt2HmBfC/CGO6qLX+o=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
References: <20190207105106.GB1772@server.ds9a.nl> <C7C3BAF7-4BD4-4EE2-B3F2-1F8B49222980@fugue.com> <20190207130313.7g7hf4swaopnr75e@nic.fr> <FD7BFAFF-88B9-49BF-A652-3649ADCD53F9@fugue.com> <7A2202F4-FAE9-4282-BC0B-8229A9A6E016@icann.org> <A0823A81-BE76-45F4-B5FF-0ADD82352922@cisco.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <2073b35e-1383-bae1-b80e-3f3a0db6031f@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:49:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A0823A81-BE76-45F4-B5FF-0ADD82352922@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/plzFk0_JZUdNHrUDC5fmdvN8TCU>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] panel discussion on DoH/DoC
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:49:39 -0000

On 2/7/19 10:04 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> And so this brings up a key research question that would be useful to 
> answer, and perhaps those at FF and Chromium could answer it:
>
> Is there a suitable user interface that will keep users from harming 
> themselves with DoH?


If there were a pat answer to this question, we would have gone to 
release with DoH last summer. The user experience around activating and 
configuring DoH remains, as you suggest, a research topic. The standard 
here is informed consent.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email