IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Wed, 23 January 2019 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADD412D84D for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 23:26:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JLorSY42i5EP for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 23:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (www.haxx.se [IPv6:2a00:1a28:1200:9::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A68E1294D0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 23:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (mail [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id x0N7PdIq007098 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:25:39 +0100
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x0N7PbsX007083; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:25:38 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:25:37 +0100
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8999D6F3-600E-4F1A-903C-10F8CAA6E4F3@icann.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901230812390.17402@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <8999D6F3-600E-4F1A-903C-10F8CAA6E4F3@icann.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/qxcmwbOub8Txd1md86lDKG1YhYY>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:26:10 -0000

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> So, does this WG want to adopt this as a work item?

Disclaimer: I used to work for a browser company but I no longer do. I never 
spoke for them anyway.

For me, one of the key elements and features with DoH is that I as a user have 
picked a DNS provider I decide to trust. Be it a global CDN provider or my own 
cloud instance. Any other way, with the ISP or my local network admins telling 
me what server to use, is a major setback in my view.

All forms of opportunistic DoH will make it no better than opportunistic DoT, 
which ultimately will fail to protect my privacy.

At the same time I of course appreciate that there's a problem/challenge here 
with figuring out what DoH server to use and how to even find out that there 
is one offered. If I don't know any servers, getting one or a few suggestions 
might help. For this, this spec offers ways and I'm for the working group 
adopting this.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email