Re: [Doh] Request for the DOH WG to adopt draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh

Okay, but for that use case, why not DoT rather than DoH?   What's the
advantage of DoH in this use case?

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:39 AM Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=
40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> > Il 23 gennaio 2019 alle 8.25 Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> ha
> scritto:
> >
> > For me, one of the key elements and features with DoH is that I as a
> user have
> > picked a DNS provider I decide to trust. Be it a global CDN provider or
> my own
> > cloud instance. Any other way, with the ISP or my local network admins
> telling
> > me what server to use, is a major setback in my view.
>
> This could be true for you and me, but average users have no idea of what
> the DNS is - they only make one choice, they pick an *ISP* that they decide
> to trust. They pay to get "Internet access" from that company and expect
> that company to provide all it takes for "the Internet to work", including
> DNS resolution, without them having to do anything; this has been the
> default situation for the last 20 years at least.
>
> So it's fine if smarter users make changes to this default and pick a DNS
> provider different from their connectivity provider, and it's fine to
> empower them to do so, but it's not fine to break the way the Internet
> normally works for most people, which includes an automated and effortless
> mechanism to get the DNS resolution service from the ISP when connecting to
> the network.
>
> Regards,
> --
>
> Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
> vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com
> Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>