Re: [Doh] ..I don't get it (the hate)

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 26 March 2019 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688AF120047 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iwa-zbsmd7tw for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213181202D0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id d18so8397425lfn.3 for <doh@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A260eH7IoJ6DtKAeTm0NeWTGZRrZ7uihLDgJKxchJJs=; b=L4/cKOvAZ75Q5nN0aXZtm0giUN/cB8DmzxPgfFtFAvPlsgYVCITkQGYw2D2fl5xY6v 9npycSGlvq0Ica1eTILOcZP0fFUSnRYXvuO4L3785DZyD/ewd+68y06nxhp+Paohg8Sh U6LlevNoJZenwZwxvm73k9an1V76XeU+0P3JA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A260eH7IoJ6DtKAeTm0NeWTGZRrZ7uihLDgJKxchJJs=; b=JBUVUwDHhh0Hy2jtaL3ii7X2mOoPlH7iHUAKI4j5h/u4EUewBWH7or6c3fJo9p9HOo fxg3D/Bkmau6EWYraAPUtfigpw0Wg6WJsjM/Ahkx/9zvgti9FjPZYaL83okDt0hpjhoD t5zYaNI6ltHpVE6WuSJbHb3VosxIHUI7MLwVD2GgYSIQ5lPih7ryo7E76zhLtue582dp AFOpbnPxGj8XJmF4fOqmCMX2kAHLAQHC4XmshztRECE76KPfUqX5N6117G95BBBpVMdD uCQp4/LCJSF58eXzOnYj3Trs64/Lm1lNIzNnFTdF54xhYwRNIdgc3D2h+NgUURFVKgf3 GZxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUyAlhBqWO/zDyb2rCSlsvtJ1lB7+8ux/h8KdpANKOktIjExzaA ey8OLuU/OUqrwDcyxFdlultOz96ymX+9HoX5W6doQlikeH4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyVX3MeYJ504e74iOY8D+32HgBA9E2qK8Q+aEJBbCo1HrnEe1jehnQ8NcWD29TWJSTnsYHQ7+jc+qk5GZ4/+4s=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c507:: with SMTP id w7mr16248680lfe.56.1553599885194; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:31:24 -0700
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
References: <CAKr6gn29O-Loq2SsHSUTQgfFqTMVjExQoLiV6R8AnGFmVf1H7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn29O-Loq2SsHSUTQgfFqTMVjExQoLiV6R8AnGFmVf1H7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:31:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJhMdTMsogPP4bybWqMAQoK_WQkwqqB+25UcMtnZpD8OvOsnTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/s2TqrDh2zM8zblvDaPriH_8Ug9c>
Subject: Re: [Doh] ..I don't get it (the hate)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:31:30 -0000

On Mar 26, 2019, at 12:15, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:

> This is (surely) between me, the browser vendor, and the website? Why
> does the ISP have any say in this?

The ISP (or equivalent actor) has the opportunity to have a say today.
Some deployment models would take this opportunity away.

I don't believe the concern is for sophisticated users who can make
informed choices. I can use a tor browser right now that also defeats
the ISP's opportunity to participate in the resolution process. That's
not controversial.

The contentious aspect is, I think, the potential for a majority of
end-users who are not sophisticated and hence are unable to make
informed decisions to have this behaviour changed for them.

It's not the existence of the mechanism, it's the potential scale of
the deployment.


Joe