[Doh] DOH and split DNS
"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 05 November 2017 15:46 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1A113FA91 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:46:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QaDWDv7jc_GE for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C5113F979 for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [169.254.97.244] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id vA5Fj9J8013678 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <doh@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 08:45:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [169.254.97.244]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: doh@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 07:46:33 -0800
Message-ID: <C7B43C35-55DE-41FE-BE66-5D7BBDB6FC9A@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.7r5425)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/scsXq82psJrIE2t5wkzyB1lpzKI>
Subject: [Doh] DOH and split DNS
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 15:46:37 -0000
On 5 Nov 2017, at 0:30, Eliot Lear wrote: > * Use of this mechanism can cause problems with split DNS, where the > internal DNS is not the same as what is made available externally. > Many corporate networkers hide their internal topology from the > external DNS. If an end host queries an external DNS for an > internal resource, the result would be NXDOMAIN. To avoid this, at > a minimum, the browser should have some configuration as to what is > internal. I conjecture that this would reflect what is commonly > found in a proxy.pac file.
- [Doh] DOH and split DNS Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Doh] DOH and split DNS Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Doh] DOH and split DNS Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Doh] DOH and split DNS Patrick McManus
- Re: [Doh] DOH and split DNS Eliot Lear