Re: [Doh] WGLC #2

Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl> Wed, 23 May 2018 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA15124319 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2018 00:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CxNMWPUN-dCD for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2018 00:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl (mx-out.tlen.pl [193.222.135.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227A512DA19 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2018 00:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 15295 invoked from network); 23 May 2018 09:12:23 +0200
Received: from agsm225.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (HELO [192.168.1.22]) (mat.jonczyk@o2.pl@[217.99.90.225]) (envelope-sender <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP for <doh@ietf.org>; 23 May 2018 09:12:23 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mateusz_Jo=c5=84czyk?= <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
To: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
References: <CAHbrMsCxkogJ-fzubf7cPgvbeGAhWUFKV3crrmn4ee6=fDnqwQ@mail.gmail.com> <382ba525100a4561b086fe8b8b6527be@ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com> <603D7553-D1A9-4DCC-9E74-199059C56A9F@sinodun.com> <1daad94d-99c1-803a-f52c-1dd17adefb7a@o2.pl>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <d2321dff-0e8c-276b-a0a9-b28ce351a439@o2.pl>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 09:12:14 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1daad94d-99c1-803a-f52c-1dd17adefb7a@o2.pl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="70nJ0SZDRZ7oF4xCMuUtIfIJbuvRNBBVB"
X-WP-MailID: cddc77b0ef136fa7d97c6a92b6639ba7
X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2
X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000000 [QUNk]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/uJqzYmkY2Bz01zF6Dv7IPghCdJk>
Subject: Re: [Doh] WGLC #2
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 07:12:31 -0000

W dniu 22.05.2018 o 19:29, Mateusz Jończyk pisze:
> W dniu 22.05.2018 o 17:37, Sara Dickinson pisze:
>> The reason I think it is useful to have Section 4 is that Section 6.3 (Server Push) discusses which URI’s pushes should be accepted from and so is implicitly talking about which servers to use. However _if_ section 4 is moved I think there should at least be a reference in section 6.3 to Section 9.
> 
> I would argue that section 6.3 "Server Push" is poorly written and needs to be
> clarified. I have asked several questions about it in the past:
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/doh/current/msg00558.html
> in order to better understand it. (I would like to thank Patrick McManus and Ben
> Schwartz for explanations I received.)
> 
> I propose that it should be rewritten simply to:
> 
> 	A DNS API client MUST ignore pushed DNS API requests (see {{RFC7540}}
> 	Section 8.2) whose pushed request URI does not match the configured DNS
> 	API server.
> 

I have received no response, so have sent a pull request:
	https://github.com/dohwg/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https/pull/185

Greetings,
Mateusz Jończyk