Re: [Doh] [Ext] Re: Associating a DoH server with a resolver

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 24 October 2018 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6757130E02 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJ_m-FFAK1ry for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D42130DF0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:24:12 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:24:12 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
CC: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Doh] [Ext] Re: Associating a DoH server with a resolver
Thread-Index: AQHUa7UvSo5WfKDXeEqFP1wNfOnvHKUvCeyA
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:24:11 +0000
Message-ID: <DBD06A93-75BF-456F-ABD0-07DF49263F34@icann.org>
References: <02C39DFD-9550-447D-B00E-702B441A88BE@icann.org> <CABkgnnV2YMtcdOyMfE2NMH4L1ZbK4dcp1KQt3FttCfz-nfQd6A@mail.gmail.com> <C82FBB08-8DAA-4C50-8934-576596C2532F@icann.org> <CABkgnnVgZBp7bqv9u9iBbZAojQqbYAGWG54Ta5JKq_ycvaux1g@mail.gmail.com> <D51AB5D6-CCAD-4C2D-9FE3-8906CD39F129@icann.org> <fce1be9f-e2ca-c930-8961-097b0a97b92e@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <fce1be9f-e2ca-c930-8961-097b0a97b92e@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6AF34F9C-898A-4179-A443-204A291A882B"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/uKERZq5g0nLKaDyw3hLF9A-3Fdo>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Re: Associating a DoH server with a resolver
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:24:16 -0000

On Oct 24, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> And CAB forum rules have allowed issuance of such certs for quite a while now. The issue isn't technology or permission -- it's CA policies. I think you'd need to find CAs willing to issue such certs before you feel comfortable predicating a technology on them.

At the last IETF meeting, I was told by one large CA that they have happily/profitably been issuing IP-address certs for years. OTOH, they did indicate that they didn't think many of their competitors were doing so.

--Paul Hoffman