Re: [Doh] New version: draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh-03.txt

["Ralf Weber" <[e-mail]>]

Moin!

On 24 Mar 2019, at 9:20, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> The diffs here are what I think have general agreement from the 
> discussion about this draft so far, but I may have missed things. 
> Comments are still quite welcome.
I have some questions after reading -03 (and skipping -02 ;-)
- The resolver IP addresses returned from DNS on section 4 are these 
Do53 server addresses or DoH server address or are they just the IP to 
start the process in section 2 (maybe 3)?
- On section 3 a non compliant current server will return NXDomain. What 
are we going to do with this answer (treat is as no DoH associated)?

> As for the late discussion of using the URI RRtype instead of TXT, I 
> would not know what to put in the "priority" and "weight" values. That 
> alone seems enough reason to leave this as a TXT record, but others 
> might disagree. It's not a lot of effort to change the text to the URI 
> RRtype, but I don't want to do so unless it is actually better than 
> TXT.
Another option could be a new RRType, given that it doesn’t have to be 
provisioned on auth servers it should not be that difficult to roll it 
out. We still could use the special name or just ask .

So long
-Ralf
—--
Ralf Weber