Re: [Doh] [Ext] Are we missing an architecture? (was Re: DNS Camel thoughts: TC and message size)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 14 June 2018 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6151A130EED for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4g9Tf8Zrf5t for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1FF7130E5B for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f1-v6so8370764ioh.6 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ko0xzwp2PW6LRnY6HpSEsPDK6YmdnIxJvBpLOb3WrhY=; b=iIQtqPibQhuTNJjHw4CVumTAX3Iw7oOV3+c90c+WntwFwdzVDMC0zV9dzN9cjRsWKQ XQOU8u/F6xe/MJgJfNUySnKll2/U8O3C9AcUIk6wlADrdlkHbzqIDrlYlvEzBNDbHbSM XRPDWbybgNlJUIssVem4GiUV9NEfAHoibY+vF2Q6UaKUb7Gr8IOaA554gWGUtE7utrnX H3NyoxuLSzorGJ/miyfZhL/S2LQHNWVUGSdQMsqbaxY6/xOZXp6X378nh1iXlDlOdFVp a/4RN8BMY1Vs39Etn5gqp6uH45PBpiC01d4MLNwdaVapVkIqJp/dYOrxm1P7NXIb8pdm udDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ko0xzwp2PW6LRnY6HpSEsPDK6YmdnIxJvBpLOb3WrhY=; b=L4zonrNgMa4GGcMQMAuzAW57GLi/uo/bod0drNtba0wpOkTDlaQYxkAxBXoH/q1aU2 DQzVlYv2on8iPtY2IsJ/uWtY0uOKhl1RzdV0JD0razgu9rOsFPNWwjGKbXoPA8ARMW+U N1N9iEAGBd8hE8NUPYWCY5Rn8nNeuxGQh/9BpyuWg6OFIhec9u40+4xhSUNtjy3xX8WB oIaNOEyViVah2R2UNS/twKhCGiv623gF3JI1Wmg404AtHtm/OH6tZop+xv7lmVT2DbOG iIutCyA6HYDyl3psuvTOlL47+x4zatGcULj5EsT+1XM83q5Q47vJU1+tjeIfr/3OswXe 4EcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0RsinygDIju5ILTqIeUyN+a7NH6P7ye56dEB8f0IntEu2Lz7Jc P0ZLbPjAAGUpnjqv+qZGFzwYigJf7OxpHMl7wnJE+w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLkbSGOoU23ONj8IpwGNYXcXWktj3gaBVwzyGlQYhQj/VXc+lxyPPq/LlmmHDT60AFY8rSBSkWneJFP1mzRhvw=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:9d15:: with SMTP id g21-v6mr3797193ioe.85.1529004935293; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:6f86:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F6CEE7B0-E0BF-4EF7-9BDD-4DA7B539A511@icann.org>
References: <1E183D79-5716-47E5-8604-A4F5DC7588C2@icann.org> <045241e6-6d9f-162c-6ae3-0b10d59d21de@bellis.me.uk> <6BB0D47F-2BA3-4D9A-A125-1D1E180B06E0@icann.org> <53c320bc-6ea0-21f4-c7a1-1da34bbdb38d@nic.cz> <CAHbrMsBoKE-pfz97ZDb9ReLKMedk2KJ7xLCw_MPmxVtqF7PcuA@mail.gmail.com> <20180613192030.GA2792@jurassic> <CAHbrMsACdaz13v=2jbpZq1RU-_CP36Cgz13iFFWVj8qrjQ0b=g@mail.gmail.com> <20180613205637.GA23215@jurassic> <CAOdDvNr0ob_zhMw1BT_h8n77ecx5vht8WJ7OiwwDPrj0Wxf8SA@mail.gmail.com> <20180614042217.GA25915@jurassic> <20180614044113.GA27115@jurassic> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1806140728270.30130@tvnag.unkk.fr> <74D48781-9F05-482C-ACB2-7AB027611489@sinodun.com> <40ac87db-dfdb-5305-338d-ff3afb8e159d@o2.pl> <F6CEE7B0-E0BF-4EF7-9BDD-4DA7B539A511@icann.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:34:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kBEv-ACPiWKckMGrQFu=F=pTD-D6oByzktmQe76AZYZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Mateusz_Jo=C5=84czyk?= <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000074494056e9f3412"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/vzsRgvOJz2yLdyYhuA_J1siqR1A>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] Are we missing an architecture? (was Re: DNS Camel thoughts: TC and message size)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 19:35:39 -0000

Paul, Mateusz, can you talk about the use case for using DHCP to discover
DoH?   It's not at all clear to me.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>;
wrote:

> On Jun 14, 2018, at 12:12 PM, Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>; wrote:
> > There is a need for robust DHCP to discover DOH servers.
>
> Agree.
>
> > I hope that separate DOH settings in web browsers are just a stopgap
> measure
> > until operating systems will support DOH.
>
> We haven't gotten much traffic on the driu mailing list <
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/driu>;, but I do hope we get more on
> this.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list
> Doh@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh
>
>