Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 12 March 2019 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293AF1277E7; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxY_TxqOVBBG; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E26130DF6; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D282A28033B; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:44:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (pa-th3.interco.nic.fr [192.134.4.74]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99D3280285; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:44:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5778663E720; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:44:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD36440235; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:44:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:44:37 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, doh@ietf.org, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, dnsop@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, "Ackermann, Michael" <mackermann@bcbsm.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <20190312154437.sefkyglilqvwexx7@nic.fr>
References: <1700920918.12557.1552229700654@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <7667c4d7-2e78-0a27-84af-cf1c00fd4897@cs.tcd.ie> <1991054337.12802.1552259263075@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <eea64b30-aad0-a030-5360-1b1484f1d0e3@huitema.net> <CAPsNn2WhjHSEHJUEL8GB6X0d24fkajgPnY4YgkOQbXjyxb5q8Q@mail.gmail.com> <e62efaf3-4a35-4a52-5ed4-dee2e7fafe72@huitema.net> <CAPsNn2VGu-_jUxeKhfd2Yc1bdM=UxaKaO_gdNSV8GX99K1zcyA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPsNn2VGu-_jUxeKhfd2Yc1bdM=UxaKaO_gdNSV8GX99K1zcyA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/yK9VvAwCRxd178NLPgdb4Op4FCs>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:44:41 -0000

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:59:11AM +0530,
 nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com> wrote 
 a message of 231 lines which said:

> Companies also (validly, in my opinion) wish to know if their
> employees are going to fantasyfootballgame.com while they are
> supposedly doing work and of course, other sites which people should
> not be going to during work time.  If I am paying someone, I expect
> them to do work that I wish them to do.

Not all companies work that way. Some evaluate the work done by the
results, not by the time spent at the desk. Please let's not discuss
IETF protocols while assuming that all companies are the same, and
that we have to endorse all their policies.