[Doh] panel discussion on DoH/DoC

bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bert@hubertnet.nl>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A8F12DDA3 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 02:51:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWazZ3jwMfoj for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 02:51:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xs.powerdns.com (xs.powerdns.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285FB13107E for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 02:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server.ds9a.nl (ip565244ed.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl []) by xs.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C40E9FD6E for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:51:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by server.ds9a.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 484D9ACCEC3; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:51:06 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:51:06 +0100
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
To: doh@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190207105106.GB1772@server.ds9a.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/yOMyw5lzzkYQFM8JcW244slLZdI>
Subject: [Doh] panel discussion on DoH/DoC
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:51:17 -0000

Hello everyone,

Last weekend at FOSDEM in Brussels there were three sessions on DNS Privacy,
Daniel Stenberg presented a keynote session “DNS over HTTPS – the good, the
bad and the ugly”, Vittorio Bertola discussed “The DoH Dilemma” while
Daniel, Stéphane Bortzmeyer and I formed a DNS Privacy Panel expertly
moderated by Jan-Piet Mens.

I wrote up what I learned on https://blog.powerdns.com/2019/02/07/the-big-dns-privacy-debate-at-fosdem/
and added some strongly worded conclusions on what I think of

So what is DoC? A lot of the animosity towards DoH is not actually directed at
DoH-the-protocol. The problem people have is with centralizing DNS on cloud
operators ("DoC").

For further discussions, if someone is venting on DoC but calling it DoH, we
can point out that they should not direct their anger at the poor DoH
protocol that can't help what people do with it.

Anyhow, this and much more can be found here:


I hope this will be useful to you.