Re: [domainrep] Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt> (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 21 August 2013 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E938211E81DC for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PWSpcE8LjSk6 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC4E11E81BD for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7L7tWfG027358; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377071747; bh=yHUhqBdGHwlzI1jfdvyCnUQAEOMAYJheScZuK3vQQ3I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Q1yQfdsfhkTyQR3w/VeWwwppWZsKmOqiYSJLQX9PbDzFlxdYvyICKpLv3LoEZZXog VVx9PE0JUXsP9Xw4NOYkzB09Af5d68CvCDDEAEDOywJVv9WdJ4y6s+LTDh48Sm2Xn4 hG70zdcKfhCtCY3cKbBQ7i1MtxZakW0qdH5UNBqg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377071747; i=@resistor.net; bh=yHUhqBdGHwlzI1jfdvyCnUQAEOMAYJheScZuK3vQQ3I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=TwcoW41eTBzfCHIdpQs4OyoFGRfBHrKTbWXhYKFuqpOUQ1GwwIXui56UMmCpnyo3w bdGsobsVh3bSG1rIWDbv/+GOfYIUYrBoTUMf6Fd4O+10I6E12/1JjgY44FCO9FVWt+ RhV2ky6cHRkMdJ2cVosmGPN1bRWuMRSrUwfCeEaQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130821005143.0b98d050@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:52:32 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZ-o_1jmLExgGxdNVG686Zs-n8iW54m5b9rU96vxR-d1w@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20130815144507.22504.36661.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130815104802.0b87f9b0@resistor.net> <CAL0qLwZ-o_1jmLExgGxdNVG686Zs-n8iW54m5b9rU96vxR-d1w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: domainrep@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt> (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:56:05 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 00:17 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>Sure, mentioning something about the stored aggregated data also 
>makes sense in Section 8.  I'll add something.

[snip]

>Reputations can certainly be private things, both as an aggregate 
>"result" and as the pieces of data that allowed that result to be 
>reached.  But I don't think that's a new point given the above.  The 
>new text will cover it.

Ok.

Regards,
-sm