Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 12 July 2013 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F11121F9EFD for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVL2jTKQ32rE for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8280021F9ED9 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id up14so11958704obb.0 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jWo0UP9Q4kc80Xbf25/zZ4n9FIxXqrvzyyJEKCpSNeo=; b=v1JBiXIlq6ZZiBrqGaeZrsnv9UzDUyusyr5hw2UYagCb2NTiyXgZ0y7xQENXtEj/oX kzTkiuoNd0rwc0SpryNJWcrZK6vIS+PYFXkDwlVSiSLQt+7VLXMEPo4VW+f3QnaudjBW mrAl3OXXU3XqOifvpcC9a8AR4aiSchuqvWbnwOgFtmZl2rjmwFFzFdR+S0QgTVQdb605 pFXFzYSjDVnNkbuIpHSBKw1eb4BGHkUCwKWvEf1L2AIb06l25fJ0tI+B5PRPLGvJ/6Gb OXiFqkrGIEUGGUw8JFQYkFbDfQ+pIQKT007OYboESzLdWM2eoggoevcQqjE7XYvgfjVH ALnQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.39.193 with SMTP id r1mr37283521oek.40.1373664593004; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.218.9.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm21576285obx.11.2013.07.12.14.29.50 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51E07531.8020202@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:29:21 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwa8zQth_jvMeyxH-RWVLngW47JFXVa0fdWqmvFQ76Ai8g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa8zQth_jvMeyxH-RWVLngW47JFXVa0fdWqmvFQ76Ai8g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-repute-model.all@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-repute-query-http.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:29:55 -0000

On 7/12/2013 1:49 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> The main changes since the WGLC versions are:
>
> (1) "rater-authenticity" has been changed to "well-behaved", with a
> corresponding change in description.  The previous name and description
> were sufficiently gelatinous that this change seems justified.  My own
> implementation used this, but with a fixed value for all replies, so
> changing it to be a different name with largely the same intended
> meaning will not be harmful.


Folks,

It would help the formalities of IETF process for you to look over the 
change in the document:

> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-repute-media-type-09

and post a note here with whatever comments you deem appropriate.


My own attempt at a substantive "ok" is:

    This nicely moves from a definition that was generic and 
behaviorally vague to one that is entirely behavioral and concrete.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net