Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 27 August 2013 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9956E11E8175 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QX1yQz66gZ8V for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E1D21F9A90 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7RJc9EE006096; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377632293; bh=L0pTAh7uS/SaKus5kY2igJ9AQXy51D4Q2PH6S2LotII=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=N23afPPoojotHm2nyWlZb8ZyN8kYJcOfMxhOpceGcz7nK8Qsv2H04JVWnZ3gYzTf9 A6ki+Xir0zI7j8jcWlbbWbAfOMCStFez8HfDmUwf7hMsCTH9EzFrLlgc2ioZ80IM7y UirAUGMZRQJWjMcsS40jI/C0ee6HgYPf/kVuftHc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377632293; i=@resistor.net; bh=L0pTAh7uS/SaKus5kY2igJ9AQXy51D4Q2PH6S2LotII=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=tXg9iQwXkrfwNacywozLHqNSDct3dso3VIdJLTEcOdpSNaug/dlVBMYGAIwEzfYUX y8i7WhAZGj5fl/sYOCM3c9LryF+tKZ3KxvGOWsXkezEL4OvjSl1zPfaU75DgENd7w/ w/xj716RO0sbXC9kuggRPkYko5aETmYMcC5m4jDI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130827123553.0d270df0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:37:38 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZxr8cY4QgQwhBQU9QzPHBxK6Y8oS9XS5bfNXNe2SdnMQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20130827143229.8650.90859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZxr8cY4QgQwhBQU9QzPHBxK6Y8oS9XS5bfNXNe2SdnMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: domainrep@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:38:26 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 07:35 27-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>Some minor LC feedback, and more importantly changes state to 
>Proposed Standard as suggested during LC.  A revised IETF LC will be 
>issued today.

Please note that I was not suggesting the change to Proposed 
Standard.  I clarified my comment in the off-list message.

Regards,
-sm