IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C8A21F92C2 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ao5BpGJiNaYm for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAE421F91CE for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id dn14so3070181obc.16 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BxMUeOpltsEz4dfpCl1RYCZAVlPnny4P9QHtryTbdz0=; b=RkvMI2qtkjGotRtbvUNExTywROFZdTRGszf5tdVSIeZ1xC2CVvamImc3RytzCAboxG Gt5c9lp16mMMHCaUOtMkojXIHsOd7ycab0W7WLDsa284WuXQ3EIUjfATHYE0NeP7UEFz dtiZi2ME+T3lN4Gk6J4JQH2aVsMlmNeuFCxwmpzjv4BKAghhu10w7nZ2qTofNzTXLi8G c15O/lvmbeiutFtvGSA+hz6WjCMO5kuKXRFAnc6LbNg9cDpApj9O/9Y8LqGl5p7hGs55 sEJV4LKysxjQI0orF4+iuIm6CER2JUbRL6WetZT2N5+un0Pk/vwpUDm9IAXqOkD9lYH7 V0ng==
X-Received: by 10.182.72.170 with SMTP id e10mr5207161obv.62.1374106669336; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.218.9.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qa4sm11329362oeb.5.2013.07.17.17.17.47 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51E73407.6000706@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:17:11 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307130131020.62942@joyce.lan> <20130713184213.39838.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwaWAmhcvt_2DUMShk=_V7PRvfZujQDFVHy3YY7y348Z-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZ6URZVNrvbuOaMbnBPYhLbiuBwQ+K6hYdxw9Yd4uSSCA@mail.gmail.com> <51E72685.3080605@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYGR5KcK_o7mdO7kYdqWLU7OGQLFF_0ee=0UCD_7wiEKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYGR5KcK_o7mdO7kYdqWLU7OGQLFF_0ee=0UCD_7wiEKA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:17:55 -0000

On 7/17/2013 5:01 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>     As soon as you guys finish this negotiation and Murray re-issues the
>     I-D with the new text -- by way of dotting t's and crossing i's -- I
>     can start the formal publication sequence, which begins with the wg
>     agreeing that the doc is done.
>
> If you're willing to accept it, John and I came to this text over IM,
> and Pete was fine with it.  I can post a new document if you think we're
> agreed enough here to move ahead.  Seems unlikely we'll get other
> responses at this rate, unfortunately.


Dandy.  Make it so.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email