IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Wed, 14 November 2012 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1926E21F85CC for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:57:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.627
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uEn5-tLeDWJD for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:57:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod6og122.obsmtp.com (exprod6og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A3021F8546 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob122.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUKOHMraODrfmrkRgHVcCZAokdZoAxFpU@postini.com; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:57:44 PST
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id qAEBvZPD024544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:57:35 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:57:35 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Chris Lewis <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca>
Thread-Topic: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04
Thread-Index: AQHNwjGXkoBmst2hW0OBDyM/nTV3mZfpNDgAgAAFzJA=
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:57:34 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6B1073@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <509C24FC.8090107@gmail.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6B0CBF@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <5604f52c-2027-454a-941a-487b5ec63ce4.maildroid@localhost> <50A32506.5090803@mustelids.ca> <CAL0qLwa2NVCW6REBxdNGKnmJio_dRBA8VXt9kG0CpTrto02HXA@mail.gmail.com> <be8950b1-ea32-4a58-8bdd-2842c211c22b.maildroid@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <be8950b1-ea32-4a58-8bdd-2842c211c22b.maildroid@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:57:45 -0000

Same here.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: domainrep-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:domainrep-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Dave Crocker
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 1:37 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy; Chris Lewis
> Cc: domainrep@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04
> 
> Wfm.
> 
> 
> d/
> --
> Dave Crocker
> bbiw.net
> 
> via mobile
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
> To: Chris Lewis <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca>
> Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04
> 
> I typed several messages arguing that we shouldn't do this, and then
> talked myself out of sending each of them.  I think that means it's a
> reasonable suggestion.
> 
> I do think it's useful to include threatening conduct as an example
> though, so how about compromise text:
> 
> ABUSIVE: The subject identifier is associated with sending or handling
> email of a personally abusive, threatening, or otherwise harassing
> nature.
> 
> ?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Chris Lewis
> <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca>wrote:
> 
> > On 12-11-13 08:44 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > > Perhaps 'personally abusive'?  Some problematic mail is not exactly
> > threatening.  E.g, sending lots of mail to you that criticizes
> > everything you post or constantly calls you an asshole.
> >
> > Better I think:
> >
> > ABUSIVE: The subject identifier is associated with sending or
> handling
> > email of a personally abusive or otherwise harassing nature.
> >
> > [The stereo-typical "love-sick stalker"'s emails aren't strictly
> > definable as "abusive" per-se in the sense of your phrase.
> Harassment
> > most certainly.  I don't think "Harassive" is a word, and the spell
> > checker seems to agree ;-)]
> >
> > I don't think you'd see that flag very often.  But for
> completeness...
> > _______________________________________________
> > domainrep mailing list
> > domainrep@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep
> >
> _______________________________________________
> domainrep mailing list
> domainrep@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email