IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04

Chris Lewis <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca> Wed, 14 November 2012 06:44 UTC

Return-Path: <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32E121F8769 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:44:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pa3wSWnsz7Al for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:44:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.mustelids.ca (unknown [174.35.130.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CB321F8758 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.8] (otter.mustelids.ca [192.168.0.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.mustelids.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2ubuntu2) with ESMTP id qAE6hsDr005862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:43:56 -0500
Message-ID: <50A33DAA.9090805@mustelids.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:43:54 -0500
From: Chris Lewis <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
References: <509C24FC.8090107@gmail.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6B0CBF@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <5604f52c-2027-454a-941a-487b5ec63ce4.maildroid@localhost> <50A32506.5090803@mustelids.ca> <CAL0qLwa2NVCW6REBxdNGKnmJio_dRBA8VXt9kG0CpTrto02HXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa2NVCW6REBxdNGKnmJio_dRBA8VXt9kG0CpTrto02HXA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:44:04 -0000

On 12-11-14 01:30 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I typed several messages arguing that we shouldn't do this, and then
> talked myself out of sending each of them.  I think that means it's a
> reasonable suggestion.
> 
> I do think it's useful to include threatening conduct as an example
> though, so how about compromise text:
> 
> ABUSIVE: The subject identifier is associated with sending or handling
> email of a personally abusive, threatening, or otherwise harassing nature.
> 
> ?

I'm good with that.  As long as we don't have to include 15 more
examples in that sentence ;-)

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email