Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Wed, 17 July 2013 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53A321F9655 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1ThyjFF0rlR for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22a.google.com (mail-oa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8A611E80CC for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j6so3413335oag.15 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d6crDdui9rambJChGAJWtsoGGQ97BuZ2jHPlmpKYm+M=; b=HedDuT61tPUvI5ByYe42wit+BcMNUpRfzwO/DmROatP7Fu2Ovd7pYCV5mr2qRVln+v nY+C4tIpdc0uPbboL3HKmzyK5g+EqmB0dpXufYf6YLw8QsqxtYM7hx9w8eAmKZTzFVWa mg0um1pSVGAy5bizICm6hMX4Svpeso08Iit2bGDWOK1KqsSDrkmQU5IzHRgiP6/7IHNi +NTpTTJvzQscBa50yAzYcC9sQNU35QzTUdRF3nazoPkp0gQ+HakFcAoz5acsK56k/Pia mBzNBKhF9BbF3+tMo1jIGK4zC38Ov3ElqCUOWf+dk0yy3xBQTS5f3+xqMfkMrE4tMgL9 ET2w==
X-Received: by 10.60.70.4 with SMTP id i4mr10774536oeu.11.1374103212420; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.218.9.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z2sm10806751obi.3.2013.07.17.16.20.10 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51E72685.3080605@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:19:33 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307130131020.62942@joyce.lan> <20130713184213.39838.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwaWAmhcvt_2DUMShk=_V7PRvfZujQDFVHy3YY7y348Z-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZ6URZVNrvbuOaMbnBPYhLbiuBwQ+K6hYdxw9Yd4uSSCA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZ6URZVNrvbuOaMbnBPYhLbiuBwQ+K6hYdxw9Yd4uSSCA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:20:21 -0000

On 7/15/2013 11:46 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> John, Pete and I are OK with this compromise (please excuse the XML):
>
>          <t hangText="normal-rating:"> An indication of what the reputation
>                 provider would normally expect as a rating for the subject.
>                 This allows the client to note that the current rating is
>                 or is not in line with expectations. </t>
>
> Any objections?


John -- since my reading of this thread has you as currently holding
         the token...

As soon as you guys finish this negotiation and Murray re-issues the I-D 
with the new text -- by way of dotting t's and crossing i's -- I can 
start the formal publication sequence, which begins with the wg agreeing 
that the doc is done.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net