Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04

"David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com> Thu, 15 November 2012 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91D721F8530 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.646, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69dVTmrsw8B6 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo3.roaringpenguin.com (www.ipv6.roaringpenguin.com [IPv6:2607:f748:1200:fb:70:38:112:54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F1A21F852D for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vanadium.roaringpenguin.com ([192.168.10.23]) by colo3.roaringpenguin.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id qAFJY8s8026551 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:34:08 -0500
Received: from hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com (dfs@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com [192.168.10.1]) by vanadium.roaringpenguin.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id qAFJY47A011471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:34:07 -0500
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:34:04 -0500
From: "David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20121115143404.276eb795@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZy4kT+wusoCx05gzSaWdD0wP7k_knq5ZoFRQib4o1H7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <509C24FC.8090107@gmail.com> <20121114074216.GB2357@x28.adm.denic.de> <CAL0qLwZPL1FYZ_9g3eh8UY=Pc7sk62qVXOEvoDLAD3RR-R5eqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYGSBhEgTmkxLU3m4u23=udEaZW83CxKbzN5B1m_d+-7g@mail.gmail.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6B17EE@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <CAL0qLwZy5kSaBHrBAqfMffWS99GsLjysgOqoN5AN8AwwpPaXCQ@mail.gmail.com> <3365326f-3d95-4581-b7a1-d943832f25d3.maildroid@localhost> <CAL0qLwZy4kT+wusoCx05gzSaWdD0wP7k_knq5ZoFRQib4o1H7A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Roaring Penguin Software Inc.
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=roaringpenguin.com; h=date :from:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=main; bh=f6y0VoOIK0a5 ISfuene8E+46Sh4=; b=ps/ESHM6iZ0pnb4BerdcKactKnkpIcTsqdl651VFWFSf KgPKmtjomfi+mGxrjHpbXrUqkRzolJyHtevUik3XS643vlF3u4cyz3+ma2NzYDpY OKp8g1+L47Yr6ArBuYhrU0zE8tEoLbYnmonI8kc6fDhyjtwx816MgxnXFBTt4ASH 2PoRh1cO7uXUdl98TGxBBeSXzIC0L8OOlT0I79aYmQxfAD7zZRY5hP3Vnk6gHX3m mH6FnDGPt/C0DpTMaxN+MUFBPdwY5Ndg3+kfvyq1b7dXFQek0DvkVthpaO2Cr983 njpHkwYNiEBMpf5Z1zS8VHTGcAcTkcSTtF8xSG9q4Q==
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 192.168.10.23
X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for 192.168.10.23
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing (inherits from default)
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: SQVyZJxqklY5buiWXYCN4T/BjiM
X-CanIt-Archived-As: base/20121115 / 01InTy8Bw
Subject: Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-04
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:34:11 -0000

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:25:23 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's a question of implementation, however. The JSON library I've
> been using does its key matching using strcmp(), which is case
> sensitive.  I presume that means JSON is inherently case sensitive.
> I think that means we don't need to say anything, because this is a
> property of JSON, not a property of the use of JSON. But I also don't
> mind being explicit about it.

I prefer explicitly say explicitly that it is case-sensitive.  Comparing UTF-8
strings case-sensitively is much easier, faster and less error-prone
than comparing them case-insensitively, especially once you use non-Latin
characters.  (I doubt that will be an issue for the reputation use-case,
but still...)

Regards,

David.