IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [domainrep] Drafts updated

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Wed, 14 November 2012 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7C221F85AB for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:17:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.733
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.223, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.643]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fl9tjciPd67z for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507BC21F8528 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id uo1so405154pbc.31 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:17:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aKcSc2FBuOPqLYBJBKQ3/DxIOMb45xgDtPRNylpIe2s=; b=XqfJrknuZBtPNATmD9n1OVKDvfuIM5K5FHtNbhkEbI3m3d6hx4ammmwDgA2tB/UOPs LAoUXrUQt4ASVghM6Na9ZcOTvHW7RXnxPYdJF5eXV1WUE6NyBMp5Wt7jeCS05Uqu5aAV 5+bvB+u/VkDiMiGpGP401kVDpNvzJiqs/hUOYuflHB/XvRI6LHAEVr6JO4aREsc/oLLn dR9Pymu0v8Y8wrHUSvupAAVfJBbsdSRWxsW/rsMrxxGeXBJ4NwZ85y2NXV6qM+NCFclb Eg5aos98YZznUVNXmGsoe+w+Kw4bmBHHsVAb7KD601XA3IrSIKwHNKbHQG6siYwSYJJ8 NIxQ==
Received: by 10.68.252.133 with SMTP id zs5mr78217266pbc.152.1352902679140; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (adsl-67-127-56-94.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net. [67.127.56.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id yi9sm7801691pbc.39.2012.11.14.06.17.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:17:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50A3A80E.1000902@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:17:50 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbpW071S7MJ5HSWGyb=HDDJq4wWwDeHy3t6e2YtEC5LeA@mail.gmail.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6B109C@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6B109C@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Drafts updated
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:18:00 -0000

On 11/14/2012 3:59 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> Yes, I like the approach. I plan on doing the same basic thing in the
> WEIRDS documents that have the same dependencies.
>
> Scott
>
> *From:*domainrep-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:domainrep-bounces@ietf.org]
...
> I gave it some thought and I think security considerations for REPUTE
> can be grouped under two headings:


Yeah.

We ran into this distinction for DKIM.  I assume it is generic to /any/ 
security mechanism spec.  And yes, the threats should be segmented 
according to these two broad categories.

d/.

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  bbiw.net

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email