Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sat, 13 July 2013 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71BE21F998D for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pu6ftis8FLjv for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2603E21F997D for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id xn12so12011872obc.6 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FlEaWKPDE79z522emjEaYoUu4vjuGxTklKVYPMx/FTk=; b=RO7fQqMwMFEa39c+JQc8IV20q/cBME4RS2EbPnVwIvFgVV1/C1lHic1YydDFEdGm56 tMroug0OLZEr7Y1bRzhO4TnTveCE8XHW0cnTv1qyMiLr6pLbvXFNXTpc8Rp7NJp/IaSK SQOq4oleRe3mHZUPGZAEmuAwfnQRguMwiaEaHknnKBJH3ZoazX+KvoEEr0TzdmBdFDZH cWC5QPaEuk8A4eWj9kq35iwbGXZnYIcpSEKneHCwjplGqtLgcL0FYfcHeUPrUxnj5Cxl T1L4UU69wcjDoepqfy/boAdhp8U0QEXZbAHwhe6owwUoZKG5om9Cpd/ip3kBuD+0hzGO v22g==
X-Received: by 10.182.125.38 with SMTP id mn6mr2562422obb.52.1373683585737; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.218.9.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rs1sm57814436obb.12.2013.07.12.19.46.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51E0BF62.90605@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:45:54 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20130713020137.14506.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130713020137.14506.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: domainrep@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 02:46:26 -0000

On 7/12/2013 7:01 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> (1) "rater-authenticity" has been changed to "well-behaved"
>
> I guess it's OK, but it seems awfully specific to spam filtering.
>
> My canonical application for repute was always restaurant reviews, so
> I could have my resto finder retrieve ratings from Yelp, Zagat, or
> Urbanspoon.
>
> Does a high well-behaved score mean that if you go to a restaurant and
> get food poisoning, you probably won't if you go back?


I suspect you are confusing core mechanism with specific application.

For each application, such as restaurant reviews, the semantics of the 
rating are defined by the application.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net