[domainrep] Protocol Action: 'An Architecture for Reputation Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-repute-model-10.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 30 September 2013 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9308121F9C52; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AO7NevxxSS5S; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBCB21F9C9B; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.72
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20130930173659.31558.36802.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:36:59 -0700
Cc: repute mailing list <domainrep@ietf.org>, repute chair <repute-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [domainrep] Protocol Action: 'An Architecture for Reputation Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-repute-model-10.txt)
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:37:00 -0000

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'An Architecture for Reputation Reporting'
  (draft-ietf-repute-model-10.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Reputation Services Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Pete Resnick and Barry Leiba.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model/




Technical Summary

   Using work on SPF and DKIM for motivation, the draft builds upon
   recent work in email authentication. The document describes a basic
   architecture for reputation queries. It defines reputation as "the
   estimation in which an identifiable actor is held, especially by the
   community or the Internet public generally." The document sets the
   stage for detailed specifications by providing:

   o Vocabulary for the current work and work of this type;
   o The types and content of queries that can be supported;
   o The extensible range of response information that can be provided;
   o A query/response protocol;
   o Query/response transport conventions.

Working Group Summary

   The document has gone through multiple drafts, over a period of time,
   that were discussed in the working group. Discussion was mild and
   supportive, with no significant controversy. The working group
   'style' was mostly of a small, collaborative set of active
   participants, but has become quite dormant in recent months. Changes
   during AD Evaluation were passed by the few remaining active
   participants.

   The document includes some core material published previously, which
   means that it is already well-established. Equally, the document's
   terminology, model and discussion are reasonably straightforward and
   not controversial.

Document Quality

   The document is well-organized, defines its scope and is usable in its
   current form.

Personnel

   Document Shepherd: Dave Crocker
   Responsible AD: Pete Resnick