Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-03
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 13 November 2012 18:35 UTC
Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0DF21F868C for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:35:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kM7sySpL7+Z6 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:35:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod6og123.obsmtp.com (exprod6og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9947121F867C for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob123.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUKKTCgRCPHWIAt9Hf+XTsk0Qtc45hNmp@postini.com; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:35:54 PST
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id qADIZo8s011302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:35:53 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:35:49 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-03
Thread-Index: AQHNvfkC4qBZIlI1cEaNhC8lQzRAgpfoHAQQ
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:35:49 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6B0D0C@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <509C259C.1070703@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <509C259C.1070703@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-03
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:35:55 -0000
I'm sensing a pattern: Section 5 of this document (Security Considerations) is still TBD. Scott
- [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-03 Dave Crocker
- Re: [domainrep] WGLC: draft-ietf-repute-query-htt… Hollenbeck, Scott