Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7609221F9D4F for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CA92SiIw0d3Q for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896A221F9D45 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z11so2370290wgg.22 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TDfJFQx6URJEZ5AA1BZyYhEnMm4m9c/p+S5vk+BFvSo=; b=oiAk+3F+3lLxTosJJH0rnsI1oALd5N9VfJuI1W7WquMe3aZLs8UAqv4um9xGXVoFbF t4rjhTsk2Pqgeqt3oFr779qeKL+iNmjmigILMcC5MmmgIQjbsGUoosHOHSe1Ss+29Mwa el9+16Grb3AQi22YeC8LAirMDvmYDw8TgE8itMjxWisfD5pUBl/AY2Bt8IdDnF7JPNL4 bMW2NCURr4YNDbeNldgowYPs/EufDaxaTFYfPKhiJckc40j++DzcpT4uqNH9KjQbtYob EW28PiAs1PPMr9Mol7OHjnOHcLwZzvCYdUYMO+58GOxWz/lxKKSRIn8m0WJYrhYpk6Jq Anxw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.239.225 with SMTP id vv1mr6635335wjc.63.1374105697532; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.16 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51E72685.3080605@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307130131020.62942@joyce.lan> <20130713184213.39838.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwaWAmhcvt_2DUMShk=_V7PRvfZujQDFVHy3YY7y348Z-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZ6URZVNrvbuOaMbnBPYhLbiuBwQ+K6hYdxw9Yd4uSSCA@mail.gmail.com> <51E72685.3080605@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:01:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYGR5KcK_o7mdO7kYdqWLU7OGQLFF_0ee=0UCD_7wiEKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493384fc41a904e1bde981
Cc: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:01:39 -0000

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/15/2013 11:46 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
>> John, Pete and I are OK with this compromise (please excuse the XML):
>>
>>          <t hangText="normal-rating:"> An indication of what the
>> reputation
>>                 provider would normally expect as a rating for the
>> subject.
>>                 This allows the client to note that the current rating is
>>                 or is not in line with expectations. </t>
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>
>
> John -- since my reading of this thread has you as currently holding
>         the token...
>
> As soon as you guys finish this negotiation and Murray re-issues the I-D
> with the new text -- by way of dotting t's and crossing i's -- I can start
> the formal publication sequence, which begins with the wg agreeing that the
> doc is done.
>
>
>
If you're willing to accept it, John and I came to this text over IM, and
Pete was fine with it.  I can post a new document if you think we're agreed
enough here to move ahead.  Seems unlikely we'll get other responses at
this rate, unfortunately.

-MSK