[domainrep] Drafts updated

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

I gave it some thought and I think security considerations for REPUTE can
be grouped under two headings:

1) Those that are attacks on the building blocks we're using (HTTP, URI
syntax, MIME, etc.);

2) Those that are attacks on either reputation consumers or reputation
service providers.

For (1), these issues are all well-documented in the RFCs that define those
building blocks.  For (2), we have a new document under development that is
a collection of all of that material.

Accordingly, I've made the various Security Considerations documents point
to those places, rather than copying text from various places into the
individual documents which runs the risk of sending divergent messages to
readers.

Is this acceptable?

-MSK