Re: [domainrep] Updated documents prior to IETF LC

["John Levine" <[e-mail]>]

In article <[e-mail]> you write:
>> Think of it as the likelihood that a bad rating from a given user is a
>> local incident versus a trending problem.

How about this:

well-behaved: An estimate by the reputation service provider of the
long term behavior of the rated identity, expressed as a
floating-point number between 0.0 and 1.0 inclusive.  If the entity's
rating is significantly different from the well-behaved score, it is
likely an aberration.  For example, in an e-mail rating system, a high
well-behaved score and a low rating might indicate a responsible
network leaking spam due to security problems, and a low well-behaved
score and a high rating might indicate a spammer who is between
hosting providers.