Re: [domainrep] Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard

SM <> Wed, 21 August 2013 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C9D11E81E6 for <>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.504
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9I53taly235 for <>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E0611E81DC for <>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (IDENT:sm@localhost []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7L7tWfE027358; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1377071744; bh=Td65R9MWqsqIAAZ/IOAt3V8UaaQtMuRXQXQ+T3MxBTs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rFIRAQ7jkfb0cjYTG2j1bgw1i40WM8DVbtIOus8Qe/8dEXn0qiYcBYcWGjAaFeGDM 30XGAfS9HWt1JoQZ7KqbavT7bXB9tSUGgsNPQ3j5G9KpVnltGj+kvMb3LbKgClEd1L 5VP32ZBKG5KM2mW0luewD3Jtwppxp69Xeyl/S9qA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1377071744;; bh=Td65R9MWqsqIAAZ/IOAt3V8UaaQtMuRXQXQ+T3MxBTs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=VmWBvJwgArAiYA94oP7ZsDIZwLVOM7T+Z4lyMv7/VTFfQiqsUvpaWM6ua6oqDQ/6E dzIkOX3f1YJ0YO/lduRHJLKh5ZAAcfVJatPw5Ud3fv/lr7jQqU5vXhEUPP6Wc6iqFP tU1ZVC43UXzgCL2Y+HMCZkGnJSJoVi4TGCIR7Pks=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:45:56 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>
From: SM <>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa=VDEi6ZChCXz+NNgMY29T5W24dU6GMjSA+kY_wj+P+g@mail.g>
References: <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:55:48 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 23:58 20-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>I left the reference to RFC4408 as is because I was unclear on the 
>timing of the processing of this document versus RFC4408bis.  I'm 
>fine with making that change if Pete thinks it's the right choice at 
>this point.


>It may not need that status given some of the material that was 
>originally here has been moved to the other WG documents.  I'll 
>defer to the chairs or the AD on that one.