Re: [domainrep] Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 21 August 2013 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C9D11E81E6 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9I53taly235 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E0611E81DC for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7L7tWfE027358; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377071744; bh=Td65R9MWqsqIAAZ/IOAt3V8UaaQtMuRXQXQ+T3MxBTs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rFIRAQ7jkfb0cjYTG2j1bgw1i40WM8DVbtIOus8Qe/8dEXn0qiYcBYcWGjAaFeGDM 30XGAfS9HWt1JoQZ7KqbavT7bXB9tSUGgsNPQ3j5G9KpVnltGj+kvMb3LbKgClEd1L 5VP32ZBKG5KM2mW0luewD3Jtwppxp69Xeyl/S9qA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377071744; i=@resistor.net; bh=Td65R9MWqsqIAAZ/IOAt3V8UaaQtMuRXQXQ+T3MxBTs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=VmWBvJwgArAiYA94oP7ZsDIZwLVOM7T+Z4lyMv7/VTFfQiqsUvpaWM6ua6oqDQ/6E dzIkOX3f1YJ0YO/lduRHJLKh5ZAAcfVJatPw5Ud3fv/lr7jQqU5vXhEUPP6Wc6iqFP tU1ZVC43UXzgCL2Y+HMCZkGnJSJoVi4TGCIR7Pks=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130821004354.0ba0e050@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:45:56 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa=VDEi6ZChCXz+NNgMY29T5W24dU6GMjSA+kY_wj+P+g@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20130815144348.25999.91573.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130815101412.0b86a108@resistor.net> <CAL0qLwa=VDEi6ZChCXz+NNgMY29T5W24dU6GMjSA+kY_wj+P+g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: domainrep@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [domainrep] Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:55:48 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 23:58 20-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>I left the reference to RFC4408 as is because I was unclear on the 
>timing of the processing of this document versus RFC4408bis.  I'm 
>fine with making that change if Pete thinks it's the right choice at 
>this point.

Ok.

>It may not need that status given some of the material that was 
>originally here has been moved to the other WG documents.  I'll 
>defer to the chairs or the AD on that one.

Ok.

Regards,
-sm