Re: [Dots] WGLC for draft-dots-use-cases-19

[H Y <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

> [Med] Yes, but the current text describes the case where the DMS supplies "its blocked traffic information":
>
>   the DDoS mitigation system can send mitigation requests
>   with additional hints such as its blocked traffic information to the
>                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   orchestrator.
>
> So, the DMS has already done that check.
[Yuhei]
+1. IMO, it's no problem with sending such hints because the DMS has
already blocked the traffic.

Thanks,
Yuhei

2019年8月6日(火) 18:20 <[e-mail]>:

>
> Re-,
>
> Please see inline.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Envoyé : mardi 6 août 2019 11:15
> > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; Valery Smyslov; [e-mail]
> > Cc : Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)
> > Objet : RE: [Dots] WGLC for draft-dots-use-cases-19
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [e-mail]
> > > <[e-mail]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 2:00 PM
> > > To: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
> > > <[e-mail]>; Valery Smyslov
> > > <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > > Cc: Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)
> > > <[e-mail]>
> > > Subject: RE: [Dots] WGLC for draft-dots-use-cases-19
> > >
> > > This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> > links or
> > > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> > > safe.
> > >
> > > Re-,
> > >
> > > Please see inline.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Med
> > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
> > > > [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > > Envoyé : mardi 6 août 2019 10:14
> > > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; Valery Smyslov; [e-mail] Cc :
> > > > Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept) Objet : RE: [Dots]
> > > > WGLC for draft-dots-use-cases-19
> > > >
> > > > Hi Med,
> > > >
> > > > No, the orchestrator is not ignoring the mitigation hints.
> > >
> > > [Med] Why? The text is clear the orchestrator acts as DOTS server. As
> > such, it
> > > can ignore/accept hints.
> > >
> > >  It is sending
> > > > filtering rules to block or rate-limit traffic to routers (last but
> > > > one line in the new paragraph).
> > >
> > > [Med] Yes. That filtering rule is that would be applied by the DMS if it
> > has
> > > sufficient resources.
> > >
> > >  The adverse impact is legitimate users whose
> > > > IP addresses were spoofed
> > > > cannot access the services of the target server.
> > >
> > > [Med] This is a check at the DMS side. This check applies independently
> > of **
> > > where ** the filters are applied. This is not specific to this NEW text.
> >
> > If the orchestrator is sending filtering rules to block traffic, checks
> > are required to ensure spoofed IP address are not conveyed by the DMS.
>
> [Med] Yes, but the current text describes the case where the DMS supplies "its blocked traffic information":
>
>   the DDoS mitigation system can send mitigation requests
>   with additional hints such as its blocked traffic information to the
>                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   orchestrator.
>
> So, the DMS has already done that check.
>
>  If
> > the orchestrator delegates the mitigation to a separate domain (recursive
> > signaling),
> > the attack information provided by DMS can include spoofed IP addresses
> > (so the new mitigator in the separate domain learns the attack traffic is
> > coming from spoofed IP addresses).
>
> [Med] This is not specific to this case, but applies each time there is recursive signaling.
>
> >
> > -Tiru
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > -Tiru
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [e-mail]
> > > > > <[e-mail]>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 12:50 PM
> > > > > To: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
> > > > > <[e-mail]>; Valery Smyslov
> > > > > <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > > > > Cc: Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)
> > > > > <[e-mail]>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [Dots] WGLC for draft-dots-use-cases-19
> > > > >
> > > > > This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> > > > links or
> > > > > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> > > > > content is safe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Tiru,
> > > > >
> > > > > The NEW text indicates the following:
> > > > >
> > > > > ==
> > > > >    In addition to the above DDoS Orchestration, the selected DDoS
> > > > >    mitigation systems can return back a mitigation request to the
> > > > >    orchestrator as an offloading.
> > > > >                      ^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > >    ....
> > > > >    the DDoS mitigation system can send mitigation requests
> > > > >    with additional hints such as its blocked traffic information to
> > the
> > > > >                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > >    orchestrator.
> > > > > ==
> > > > >
> > > > > Which means that the DMS is blocking that traffic based on "some"
> > > > > information. That same information is passed to an orchestrator so
> > > > > that
> > > > it can
> > > > > filter the traffic. What changes is ** how/where ** filters are
> > > > installed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Like the interface with a mitigator, the interface between the
> > > > controller and
> > > > > underlying routers is out of scope.
> > > > >
> > > > > From a DOTS perspective, the information supplied by the DMS to an
> > > > > Orchestrator is considered as "additional hints" which is adhering
> > > > > to
> > > > RFC8612:
> > > > >
> > > > > ==
> > > > >    GEN-004  Mitigation Hinting: DOTS clients may have access to
> > attack
> > > > >       details that can be used to inform mitigation techniques.
> > Example
> > > > >       attack details might include locally collected fingerprints
> > for an
> > > > >       on-going attack, or anticipated or active attack focal points
> > > > >       based on other threat intelligence.  DOTS clients MAY send
> > > > >       mitigation hints derived from attack details to DOTS servers,
> > with
> > > > >       the full understanding that the DOTS server MAY ignore
> > mitigation
> > > > >       hints.
> > > > > ==
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think there are new security considerations induced by the
> > > > > NEW
> > > > text.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Med
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > > > De : Dots [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Konda,
> > > > > > Tirumaleswar Reddy Envoyé : mardi 6 août 2019 08:52 À : Valery
> > > > > > Smyslov; [e-mail] Cc : Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard &
> > > > > > Patent
> > > > > > Dept) Objet : Re: [Dots] WGLC for draft-dots-use-cases-19
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The security implications of the new use case need to be discussed
> > > > > > in the draft, please see
> > > > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/tb-
> > > > > > 1ojJ6TmSmRUci6JoUeD-gB1Y
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > -Tiru
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Dots <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Valery Smyslov
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 11:56 AM
> > > > > > > To: [e-mail]
> > > > > > > Cc: Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)
> > > > > > > <[e-mail]>
> > > > > > > Subject: [Dots] WGLC for draft-dots-use-cases-19
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > this message starts a short WGLC for
> > > > > > > draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-19 to
> > > > > > confirm
> > > > > > > the WG consensus regarding the latest addition of a new use case
> > > > > > > to the draft.
> > > > > > > The WGLS will last one week and will end on Tuesday, 13 August.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Frank & Valery.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots



--
----------------------------------
Yuuhei HAYASHI
08065300884
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
----------------------------------