Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?

Resending this because it could not be sent to the DOTS ML due to a change
of my email address.

thanks,
Kaname Nishizuka

2023年3月31日(金) 12:32 Kaname Nishizuka <kaname.nttv6.jp@gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> +1 and I can't express enough how grateful I am to all of you.
> I learned a lot from the discussions I had with all of you and I am proud
> that we were able to improve the DOTS protocol as a result.
> Especially, conducting hackathon sessions and dots interoperability
> testing with Jon and other members was fascinating every time.
> I'll keep our dots implementation (https://github.com/nttdots/go-dots)
> open on github and hope it be adapted or referred by others in near future.
>
> Special thanks to all the past and current chairs who have supported us.
> Without their kind help, we couldn't have accomplished such a great work in
> IETF.
>
> Best regards,
> Kaname Nishizuka
>
> 2023年3月29日(水) 13:23 Ehud Doron <EhudD@radware.com>:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 from my side.
>>
>> Thanks a lot to all participants, chairs and ADs!
>>
>>
>>
>> Special thanks from my side to Tiru and Med for their phenomenal work and
>> true collaboration starting from the early days of this WG and throughout
>> the entire active period of the WG.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best wishes, Ehud
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Dots <dots-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * tirumal reddy
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 28, 2023 8:04 AM
>> *To:* mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
>> *Cc:* supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com; dots@ietf.org; Valery Smyslov <
>> valery@smyslov.net>; dots-chairs@ietf.org; Paul Wouters <
>> paul.wouters@aiven.io>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
>>
>>
>>
>> *CAUTION:* EXTERNAL EMAIL.
>>
>> +1, Awesome collaboration among the WG participants and the several
>> hackathon sessions that led to hardened specifications. Many thanks to the
>> DOTS WG chairs and Security ADs.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 11:06, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I also think that it is time to close.
>>
>> Many thanks to the WG participants and Chairs, especially for the good
>> and positive collaboration spirit. I personally enjoyed working in this WG.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Med
>>
>> > -----Message d'origine-----
>> > De : Dots <dots-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de supjps-
>> > ietf@jpshallow.com
>> > Envoyé : mardi 28 mars 2023 00:35
>> > À : dots@ietf.org; Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
>> > Cc : dots-chairs@ietf.org; 'Paul Wouters' <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
>> > Objet : Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I think the DOTS WG has run its natural course and can come to an
>> > end.
>> >
>> > Many thanks to all that have worked on DOTS - good to work with
>> > people who are clear thinkers, have good ideas and were prepared to
>> > check out the practical usability in the real (but aggressive!)
>> > world.
>> >
>> > I also will never stop being amazed at those for whom English was not
>> > their first language being able to sort out (as someone who is
>> > British and should know better) my incompressible grammar into
>> > something that made even better sense.  Well done!
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Jon
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Valery Smyslov [mailto: valery@smyslov.net]
>> > > Sent: 27 March 2023 15:55
>> > > To: dots@ietf.org
>> > > Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org; 'Paul Wouters'
>> > > Subject: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > the DOTS WG has completed all its tasks according to the current
>> > > charter (the last WG draft - telemetry use cases is in the RFC
>> > Editor
>> > > queue and will hopefully be published soon).
>> > >
>> > > Additionally, we don't have any new discussion on the list for
>> > quite a
>> > long time
>> > > and we skipped 3 IETF meetings for this reason.
>> > >
>> > > The chairs discussed this with the responsible AD and we came to a
>> > conclusion
>> > > that it's time to close the group or recharter it if there is an
>> > > interest in more work items related to DOTS.
>> > >
>> > > So, our question to the WG - should the group be closed?
>> > > And if the answer is no, then what are new items the WG can work on
>> > > after its recharter?
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Valery (for chairs)
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Dots mailing list
>> > > Dots@ietf.org
>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Dots mailing list
>> > Dots@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
>> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
>> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
>> ou falsifie. Merci.
>>
>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
>> information that may be protected by law;
>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
>> delete this message and its attachments.
>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
>> been modified, changed or falsified.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dots mailing list
>> Dots@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dots mailing list
>> Dots@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>
>