Re: [Dots] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-multihoming-11: (with COMMENT)

[[e-mail]]

Hi Lars, 

Thank you for the review. 

Please see inline.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Lars Eggert via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Envoyé : mercredi 20 avril 2022 14:21
> À : The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc : [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Objet : Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-multihoming-
> 11: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dots-multihoming-11: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-
> positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-multihoming/
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> COMMENT:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> 
> Section 4, paragraph 1, comment:
> > 4.  Multi-Homing Scenarios
> 
> I'm surprised to not see this section referring to any of the
> MULTI6 documents.

[Med] Actually, we do: RFC4116. I will see if/how to cite RFC4218. 

> It's been a while since I read them, but IIRC, they dealt with
> many of these
> scenarios and gave similar recommendations.
> 
> The datatracker state does not indicate whether the consensus
> boilerplate
> should be included in this document.
> 

[Med] I guess Roman can take care of this one.  

> Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/part2/#inclusive_language for
> background and more
> guidance:
> 
>  * Term "blindly";

[Med] Changed to "Randomly"


 alternatives might be "visually impaired",
> "unmindful of",
>    "unconcerned about", "negligent of", "unaware",
> "uncomprehending",
>    "unaware", "uncritical", "unthinking", "hasty", "blocked",
> "opaque"
> 
> 


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.