[Dots] 答复: (Authors-Action Required): IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel

"Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 05:35 UTC

Return-Path: <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00427130DCA; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iqFMlKLW2i53; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B944E128CF2; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id ECCF9E416DBEC; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:35:21 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.211) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:35:23 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM511-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.211]) by DGGEMM403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.211]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:35:16 +0800
From: "Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "draft-ietf-dots-data-channel@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-data-channel@ietf.org>
CC: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: (Authors-Action Required): IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel
Thread-Index: AdRRarojOS45oYXCQDKC72+4KHM8cwAAgyqw
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 05:35:15 +0000
Message-ID: <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12C86C523@dggemm511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFE389A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFE389A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.159.76]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12C86C523dggemm511mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/6WIbtIShaeL_wumt-OrqdkiQWo4>
Subject: [Dots] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogKEF1dGhvcnMtQWN0aW9uIFJlcXVpcmVkKTog?= =?gb2312?b?SVBSIENoZWNrIGZvciBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWRvdHMtZGF0YS1jaGFubmVs?=
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 05:35:29 -0000

Hi all,
I don’t hold any IPR nor am aware of any related IPR.

B.R.
Frank

发件人: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com]
发送时间: 2018年9月21日 13:20
收件人: draft-ietf-dots-data-channel@ietf.org
抄送: dots@ietf.org
主题: (Authors-Action Required): IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel
重要性: 高

Hi co-authors,

In order to help preparing the write-up for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel, we need to answer this question:

=====
(7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why?
=====

As far as I’m concerned, I don’t hold any IPR nor I’m aware of any related to this draft.

Please reply ASAP (keep ccing the WG).

Thank you

Cheers,
Med