IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next steps?

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Mon, 08 October 2018 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F56F130FCF for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47M1wE3Kp1Zi for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B118130F67 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w98K6ZII008996; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:06:35 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu w98K6ZII008996
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1539029195; bh=91TTZLTMA1ShrOgecXfVSyna3pd5Jxja45zq/MbuR9I=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NDsxRKfSZG5Dsh/VfnBuRdwFbLvf+poUfc7UrGPKYDyWRo7Nl/2BN48IDmvXHe046 vD/FlI0yVjqLph9e7sw6Hk91C0I7Ju69QX7ufvgtrUl3nw9b+F4MNTGgce9YfnP1K2 wYUARmmAu5TY1G6uyHqOsh/KgrOs63KDt3hbhHv8=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w98K6WNQ011226; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:06:32 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:06:32 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next steps?
Thread-Index: AdRdqvQVTtrWA4LmQ0mlR3KJG9bKUABKFTDAABu/75A=
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 20:06:31 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C463CBE@marathon>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C461612@marathon> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFECC1B@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFECC1B@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/8FUSXk88yR-aiejrcw1oDNHUJ_U>
Subject: Re: [Dots] WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next steps?
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 20:06:38 -0000

Hi Med!

We can definitely put a marker in the IETF 103 agenda for this topic.  It would also be helpful to hear from the WG on this topic too.

Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 3:05 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>; dots@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dots] WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next
> steps?
> 
> Hi Roman, all,
> 
> Now that we advanced core DOTS specifications, I do think it is time to
> revive the discussion we had on multihoming and discovery. I'd like to ask
> the WG to consider adding new milestones with these two I-Ds as starting
> points:
> 
> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery-05
> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-dots-multihoming-04
> 
> FWIW, some pointers to presentations I made in previous IETF meetings are
> available at:
> 
> * https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-dots-
> architecture-multihoming-draft-boucadair-dots-multihoming-00
> * https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/slides-100-dots-draft-
> boucadair-dots-server-discovery-01
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Roman Danyliw
> > Envoyé : samedi 6 octobre 2018 21:45 À : dots@ietf.org Objet : [Dots]
> > WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next steps?
> >
> > Hello WG!
> >
> > We've been making good progress on our milestones in recent months.  A
> > summary of our current situation is as follows:
> >
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-data-channel -- submitted for publication
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel -- submitted for publication
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-requirements -- submitted for publication
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-architecture -- ready for publication; shepherd
> > write-up blocked by need for IPR statements.  See
> > https://www.ietf.org/mail- archive/web/dots/current/msg02707.html
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-use-cases -- no open issues; awaiting draft update
> > to issue WGLC
> >
> > With IETF 103 coming the next month, we need to begin planning next
> > steps (if
> > any) for the WG group beyond our current milestones and how to use
> > this meeting time (if needed).  To that end:
> >
> > ** If you would like time on the agenda at IETF 103, please let the
> > chairs know
> > ** If you have thoughts on additional work for the WG please share
> > your thinking
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dots mailing list
> > Dots@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email