Re: [Dots] WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next steps?

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Mon, 15 October 2018 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7530E130E4D for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3sZNsD52P_z for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52618130E4A for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9FCb5e5006789; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:37:05 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu w9FCb5e5006789
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1539607026; bh=YxJ1dp2bkVFzQKyNSeSXqzrGsMG8B2cgWFHTmfkkZCM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e+kZgOkMCcoIlNQVIXXM/kgEGVKGkiHBfBBZI11tNUR3nt6PvePFzcpvunXizy9KU Y3IFrOzJjGVfF34xr8fwI1eIC1XSsyInm7trZ4iHED7JKmnZ9y19c7nbeoFgkY6K6a O2NCt82JsxiZ7u6DL3cSx4WDl4klcaVjwaIPcKBY=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9FCb2WQ010788; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:37:03 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:37:02 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next steps?
Thread-Index: AdRdqvQVTtrWA4LmQ0mlR3KJG9bKUAGoUioAAA3c1EA=
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:37:01 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C46996C@marathon>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C461612@marathon> <24b42c64-60d5-f23e-bb26-f0a6694eb158@nttv6.jp>
In-Reply-To: <24b42c64-60d5-f23e-bb26-f0a6694eb158@nttv6.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/8e5J9dg5XYx1PchMSB7iMJHpYr0>
Subject: Re: [Dots] WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next steps?
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:37:12 -0000

Great news!  I'll put a marker for this topic on the agenda.

Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of kaname nishizuka
> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2018 10:00 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>; dots@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dots] WG document summary, IETF 103 call agenda, WG next
> steps?
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> I and Jon are planning to do the next interoperability testing based on the
> latest draft.
> We'd like time on the agenda about the result of the test.
> 
> thanks,
> Kaname
> 
> 
> On 2018/10/07 4:45, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> > Hello WG!
> >
> > We've been making good progress on our milestones in recent months.  A
> summary of our current situation is as follows:
> >
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-data-channel -- submitted for publication
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel -- submitted for publication
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-requirements -- submitted for publication
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-architecture -- ready for publication; shepherd write-up
> blocked by need for IPR statements.  See https://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/dots/current/msg02707.html
> > ** draft-ietf-dots-use-cases -- no open issues; awaiting draft update to
> issue WGLC
> >
> > With IETF 103 coming the next month, we need to begin planning next
> steps (if any) for the WG group beyond our current milestones and how to
> use this meeting time (if needed).  To that end:
> >
> > ** If you would like time on the agenda at IETF 103, please let the chairs
> know
> > ** If you have thoughts on additional work for the WG please share your
> thinking
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dots mailing list
> > Dots@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots