Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13.txt
Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com> Fri, 09 October 2020 10:25 UTC
Return-Path: <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D57A3A0E55 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yi0BNomVlVD4 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpshallow.com (mail.jpshallow.com [217.40.240.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0E03A0A3E for <dots@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.jpshallow.com ([192.168.0.3] helo=N01332) by mail.jpshallow.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <jon.shallow@jpshallow.com>) id 1kQpa8-0006Fm-QP; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:25:00 +0100
From: Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>
To: 'Meiling Chen' <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, dots@ietf.org
References: <160216522698.30206.2821766755239604133@ietfa.amsl.com>, <10422_1602165604_5F7F1B64_10422_215_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303155A3C8@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2020100917395360828419@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <2020100917395360828419@chinamobile.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:25:00 +0100
Message-ID: <010a01d69e26$71650500$542f0f00$@jpshallow.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010B_01D69E2E.D32E27F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIbMmOxiw9R+ejCxETZmU0sHY+QnwFjt1hPASyeuCSo8WRKsA==
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/A3LNA52qd4HXwE3hPG0HbXBdAUQ>
Subject: Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13.txt
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:25:10 -0000
Hi Meiling, Interesting question. In my implementation this Quick-Block(1|2) is all handled in libcoap which does not care whether this is a telemetry update or signal update. I do not think that it should be restricted only to Telemetry. Regards Jon From: Dots [mailto:ietf-supjps-dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Meiling Chen Sent: 09 October 2020 10:40 To: mohamed.boucadair; dots Subject: Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13.txt Hi med, Is Quick-Block specific to Telemetry transfer or general to Signal put method? Best Regards, Meiling From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Date: 2020-10-08 22:00 To: dots@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13.txt Hi all, We made a minor edit to use the new Block3/4 names as defined by the core WG: Quick-Block1/2. We also fixed a very minor error in the YANG module. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de internet- > drafts@ietf.org > Envoyé : jeudi 8 octobre 2020 15:54 > À : i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc : dots@ietf.org > Objet : [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the DDoS Open Threat Signaling WG of > the IETF. > > Title : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat > Signaling (DOTS) Telemetry > Authors : Mohamed Boucadair > Tirumaleswar Reddy > Ehud Doron > Meiling Chen > Jon Shallow > Filename : draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13.txt > Pages : 107 > Date : 2020-10-08 > > Abstract: > This document aims to enrich DOTS signal channel protocol with > various telemetry attributes allowing optimal Distributed Denial- > of- > Service attack mitigation. It specifies the normal traffic > baseline > and attack traffic telemetry attributes a DOTS client can convey > to > its DOTS server in the mitigation request, the mitigation status > telemetry attributes a DOTS server can communicate to a DOTS > client, > and the mitigation efficacy telemetry attributes a DOTS client > can > communicate to a DOTS server. The telemetry attributes can > assist > the mitigator to choose the DDoS mitigation techniques and > perform > optimal DDoS attack mitigation. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-telemetry/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Dots mailing list > Dots@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Dots mailing list Dots@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
- [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-13.t… internet-drafts
- Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-… Meiling Chen
- Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-… Jon Shallow
- Re: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-… mohamed.boucadair