Re: [Dots] Any reason why RFC8903 is stale since 09/20?

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 12 January 2021 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE443A0DEB; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:04:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nT5VLVCGpH6t; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:04:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179593A0DF3; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:04:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 10C44kb5025621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:04:52 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:04:46 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp>
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dots-use-cases@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-use-cases@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210112040446.GP161@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <5008_1609751917_5FF2DD6D_5008_29_10_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315A67BC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6d9bb032-dc51-1190-ad3d-729ed899e8b6@nttv6.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6d9bb032-dc51-1190-ad3d-729ed899e8b6@nttv6.jp>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/DLDbGxOqiE7F7xFwnF_g2op6tFg>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Any reason why RFC8903 is stale since 09/20?
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 04:04:58 -0000

Hi Kaname,

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:41:50AM +0900, kaname nishizuka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Attached is the latest status.
> Yes, it's because some authors are not responding.
> I hope ADs will make it move forward.

It's on my list to look at.  I've heard from Bob on other topics recently,
so should be able to get some kind of update from him.

-Ben