[Dots] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-07: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I also only reviewed the diff to RFC 8782.  (I really love that feature.)

The shepherd writeup omits an answer to the question "Why is this the proper
type of RFC?"  Fortunately it's obvious here, but it would be better to be
clear about it generally.

In Section 3.1:

   The main changes to [RFC8782] are listed in Appendix A.  These
   modifications are made with the constraint to avoid changes to the
   mapping table defined in Table 5 of [RFC8782] (see also Section 6).

Section 6 of which document?

In Section 10.1: s/docuement/document/